DiscusHeckel
Acropora Gardener
Bulent,
Is there any particular reason to use it instead the "regular" GFO?
I had very very good experience using PO4x4.
Yes, there is, Alex.
My main concern with GFO is its ability to bind metals. At first glance it seems plausible that GFO binds harmful metals, such as arsenic. However, some other metals that are crucial to the colouration and growth of corals are also bound. This include, manganese, cobalt, nickel, and zinc. As Randy Holmes-Farley put it "Whether the binding of any of these ions is important in aquaria, and whether it should be considered a benefit or a detriment, remains to be established for each trace metal.". Based on my own experience, significant positive changes to the appearance and growth of my corals coincided with starting Bacto-Balance, which contains trace metals, and quitting GFO shortly afterwards. To further quote Holmes-Farley: "Since the effects of GFO on trace elements have not been clearly established in aquaria, it is possible that one or more critical elements may drop below optimal levels.". Finally, Hans-Werner Balling also recommended the use of aluminium-based phosphate binders instead of GFO if phosphate adsorbing is necessary while using Bacto-Balance. He gave an explanation, but sadly I cannot find the source, but it was to do with the release of soluble iron, which is mentioned in the link below.
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-11/rhf/index.htm
EDIT: I have just read about PO4X4. It is a Dutch product and it claims to address the release of soluble iron into the water column. This sounds good to me. I may try it if I hit buffers with FM Ultra Phos or Seachem PhosGuard. I have a private supplier in the UK who can get me this product.
Last edited: