Now this is the type of stuff that I was looking for when I inquired as to results a couple of pages back. We need more folks to step forward, so we can learn conclusively whether or not these things actually work. People have been using the pellets now for 6 months +. My bet is that, for the majority, they don't live up to the hype. I want to be proven wrong.
DJ
Actually, it seems like a majority of users are having benefits to it.
In general, if nitrate and phosphate aren't coming down, then you need to increase the flow in the reactor or making some adjustments. What I have noticed from my experiments are the following:
1) if it barely tumbles, then my phosphate and nitrate does not go down.
2) if it tumbles similar to GFO, then it slightly, very slightly reduces phosphate and ntirate.
3) if it tumbles like water boiling, where the bottom media is pushed up and the top media flowing down, then I see better results.
Also, depending on the bioload of the reefer's tank, more media may be necessary to assist in reduce the overall phosphate and nitrate because in my thoughts, there aren't enough bacteria to consume the excess bioload. If I remember correctly, bacteria consumes a good amount of oxygen, and PH eventually drops. The requirement and suggestion of a skimmer helps compensate for the lost in oxygen, drop in ph, and removal of the bacteria.
The way I gauge if the product is working by a couple of method:
1) The decrease in amount of phosphate and nitrate over the period
2) The drop in PH from the effluent of the reactor.
In addition, if the adjustments were made accordingly, then in 4-6 weeks, you should see significant improvement. You may see faster improvement if the media has already been pre-populated.
For longer use, I theorize that as the media is consumed, there would be less surface space for the bacteria to colonize (the media degrades or is consumed), which would reduce the population of the bacteria as they are skimmed out, and thus may reduce the effectiveness of the media. That is why media is continued to be replenish.
However, if there was an additional type of a media that degrades slower compare to the PCL and used in conjunction, then a base population of bacteria would be established on that type of media, but will be less when the PCL is reduce compare to a full load of PCL. The bacteria could readily resume at a quicker pace compare to reestablishing itself without the additional media.
Anyway, those are just my thoughts.