Need Advice about in wall design

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7322128#post7322128 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Creetin
Very nice! Which weldon did you use for building the sump?

Sorry for the late reply, I used weldon 4 on the sump.
 
After messing around with my closed loop for some time Ive decided that I need more flow through my 400gal and so I need a bigger pump. Im running the Sequence Dart now and I am considering the Barracuda or Hammerhead. Does anyone have any experience with these pumps. Im looking for one that is not too noisy with better flow.
 
You will be very happy with the Hammerhead. I was going to use the dart on my CL on the 300G. I returned it and went with the Hammerhead tons of flow off a OM 4-way. The pump is much larger in size as for noise it is quiet does not give off to much heat either.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7363151#post7363151 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hdtvguy
You will be very happy with the Hammerhead. I was going to use the dart on my CL on the 300G. I returned it and went with the Hammerhead tons of flow off a OM 4-way. The pump is much larger in size as for noise it is quiet does not give off to much heat either.

Thanks for the advice. I think Im gonna go with the hammerhead after all.
 
rklutt, do you have a pic of that setup? how you are using that hammerhead to run your whole system?

Mar:rollface:
 
Here is a pic of the basement sump room. you can see the hammer under the table. I have 1.5" main pipe that has 2 T's. one T goes to the frag and fuge and the other T feeds the skimmer.

sump_room_full.jpg
 
i gotta let you in on alittle info i figured out about hammerheads. i was looking into them when i was searching for a pump for my upcoming upgrade. naturally the hammerhead seamed the way to go. but then i really started looking at the numbers and figured out that the efficiency went WAY down hill in sequence pumps......except for the dart......well......multiple darts!
heres the info compairing a pair of darts to a single hammerhead
-the hammerhead uses a huge 1/3 HP motor that draws in 350w.
+darts use a much smaller 1/8 HP motor and only draws 160w. so for two darts it equals a 1/4 HP motor and only draws 320w.
-the hammerhead puts out 5800gph while cranking out 350w.
+the darts actually out perform the hammerhead. at 3600gph each thats 7200 gph while cranking out only 320w.
so the pair of darts gets you 1400 more gph at 30w less power draw.
plus theres more! you have the added benefit of knowing that if one pump fails you still have the second one running your system. also in your case you already have one of the darts to begin with.
sorry if i sound like im trying to sell something. which im obviously not, considering both pumps are made by the same company lol. but i was in the same boat just the other day when i figured this out and felt like i should share that info. hope it helps.
(btw- there is one situation were hammerheads out perform darts. when a huge amount of head is an obstacle hammerheads are the way to go.)
 
I don't think pumps ran in series (one after another), as your implying will do the trick. You will see a medium jump in output (gph) but a bigger jump is max head pressure.

Pumps are designed to operate at a certain RPM. If water is already flowing into the pump near the max flow rate @ 0' head, then the second pump will do little in terms of adding energy.

Think of peddling a bicycle down hill. Once you reach a certain speed, it will be useless for you to peddle because you are already traveling faster than you can peddle.

Pumps ran in parallel will have the same output as one pump, just more turn over through your system.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7381407#post7381407 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Charles99
I don't think pumps ran in series (one after another), as your implying will do the trick. You will see a medium jump in output (gph) but a bigger jump is max head pressure.

Pumps are designed to operate at a certain RPM. If water is already flowing into the pump near the max flow rate @ 0' head, then the second pump will do little in terms of adding energy.

Think of peddling a bicycle down hill. Once you reach a certain speed, it will be useless for you to peddle because you are already traveling faster than you can peddle.

Pumps ran in parallel will have the same output as one pump, just more turn over through your system.
I guess all those years of engineering school are paying off...:D
 
no, im not implying that. what im saying is running two return pumps on two seperate return lines. or if you wanted them for closed loops, running two closed loops. with two return pumps on seperate lines they dont make one another useless. same idea as a single return but done twice.
im really unsure as to what you mean in your explanation. 2 pumps doubles preasure to the tank, doubles flow, and doubles turn over. i think either im misunderstanding your meaning or your misunderstanding mine.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7395530#post7395530 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by xdusty6920
no, im not implying that. what im saying is running two return pumps on two seperate return lines. or if you wanted them for closed loops, running two closed loops. with two return pumps on seperate lines they dont make one another useless. same idea as a single return but done twice.
im really unsure as to what you mean in your explanation. 2 pumps doubles preasure to the tank, doubles flow, and doubles turn over. i think either im misunderstanding your meaning or your misunderstanding mine.


Clarified. I follow you now.:p
 
Back
Top