New Life Spectrum Ick Shield

Wonder if you can use this Ick Shield Powder along with PraziPro... like you can with Cupramine and PraziPro...
 
Following. Added Ick Shield powder yesterday. Had removed as many snails as I could and all the coral except about 5 Palys on a big rock and a few yellow polyps. Same concerns as others - absorption by rock and sand and breakdown by UV. Latter is easy. Glass is 3/4 and will cut all UV and I can program my Radions to use only green and red for a while. Butt ugly but ok. The absorption is another story. I'm going to boost the dosage at one week and two weeks and see how it goes.
 
Black Ich is a misnomer! It is actually a turbellarian worm and not a protozoan parasite like Cryptocaryon.

Ich-Shield may not do much against it or just kill some of it because it kills many inverts.

The proper treatment is with a medication that specifically targets worms like for example PraziPro.

CP will work for flukes so I would assume it works with other worms... CP works for many other things than just ich and velvet but is only advertised for those two. The owner of NLS told me the same thing
The stuff decimated my bristleworm population so it will kill worms
 
Just spoke with Jeff (I think) from NLS:

* To remove you can just put on UV which breaks the IS down.
* Carbon also removes treatment so must take carbon etc. off line.
* Does not "stick" to rock or sand. (Confirms what grandpa10 was told as well. +1)
* Does not kill encysted organisms.
* Protein skimmers DO remove the chemical - it is an polar molecule so attaches to an air water interface - and thus skimmers must be taken off line.
* In QT 21 days is considered sufficient as you start with a clean tank with IS in the water there should not be any encysted organisms and it kills the free swimming stage.
 
I'm curious, with CP, if you run it for say, 14 days, then transfer the fish to a new tank, wouldn't it be clear because all of the trophonts would have fallen off within 7 days and CP killed any that hatch. I'd think even 8 days would be good enough in most cases.

so, if you were transferring to a new tank, then you'd just have an un-medicated tank for observation, cutting the duration time way down (Especially helpful for fish reacting poorly to treatment)
 
I'm curious, with CP, if you run it for say, 14 days, then transfer the fish to a new tank, wouldn't it be clear because all of the trophonts would have fallen off within 7 days and CP killed any that hatch. I'd think even 8 days would be good enough in most cases.

so, if you were transferring to a new tank, then you'd just have an un-medicated tank for observation, cutting the duration time way down (Especially helpful for fish reacting poorly to treatment)

Perhaps, but if you are going to treat for 14 days and transfer the fish, why not just run the fish through TTM and be assured the parasite has been eradicated?
 
Just spoke with Jeff (I think) from NLS:

* To remove you can just put on UV which breaks the IS down.
* Carbon also removes treatment so must take carbon etc. off line.
* Does not "stick" to rock or sand. (Confirms what grandpa10 was told as well. +1)
* Does not kill encysted organisms.
* Protein skimmers DO remove the chemical - it is an polar molecule so attaches to an air water interface - and thus skimmers must be taken off line.
* In QT 21 days is considered sufficient as you start with a clean tank with IS in the water there should not be any encysted organisms and it kills the free swimming stage.

Thick accent? The not absorbing in rock makes sense since it didn't hurt anything invert wise in my 220g
 
Perhaps, but if you are going to treat for 14 days and transfer the fish, why not just run the fish through TTM and be assured the parasite has been eradicated?

because TTM involves more moves (more stress) more work, more expense(salt). and you are only 99.999% sure it's eradicated :D I just think people are too obsessed with TTM on this forum. There are other solutions... plus I was thinking 8 days could do it.
 
I just think people are too obsessed with TTM on this forum.

Not obsessed, we just like to advocate protocols that are effective. TTM is not stressful and not that much work once you do it a couple of times.

I think you'll find the regulars in this forum embrace multiple treatment protocols, provided they are supported by evidence. CP, copper and hypo all fall into this category.
 
Not obsessed, we just like to advocate protocols that are effective. TTM is not stressful and not that much work once you do it a couple of times.

I think you'll find the regulars in this forum embrace multiple treatment protocols, provided they are supported by evidence. CP, copper and hypo all fall into this category.

+1 TTM and CP are the only two I use. Some fish you would be foolish to attempt to use anything but TTM on
 
Yep, would certainly agree with that. I have limited experience with saltwater fish disease (somehow always got lucky-plus good LFS) . But so far I think CP is an excellent solution. And would only do TTM if the fish might not survive CP.. which is a bit backwards from what people on here typically recommend. I'm amazed that people claim TTM isn't stressful. Anytime you catch a fish it is stressful for them. Now if you are talking about stress compared to copper or some medications, yeah not that bad.
 
Last edited:
Anytime you catch a fish it is stressful for them. Now if you are talking about stress compared to copper or some medications, yeah not that bad.

I always see "stress" as an objection to doing TTM, and it's really not a factor. It may cause some short-term (acute) stress during the actual transfer process, but if you do it properly you shouldn't have to chase the fish around the tank. I lower the water level in the QT to just a few inches and scoop them right up. Never have to chase them around. And, since transfers are typically done in the mornings before lights on, the fish aren't alert and they are easy to catch. I just ran a Kole Tang (typically a very shy fish that stresses easily) through full QT including TTM and he wasn't bothered by the process one bit.

I look at it this way: better a few instances of acute stress than chronic stress exposed to harsh chemicals like copper or (even worse) diseases. But hey, if you prefer other methods to TTM, more power to you. :)
 
Also Steve has used TTM on all his fish and he has a Gem tang and I seriously doubt he would of ran it through TTM if it was that stressful... We are talking about a 2K fish
 
got home from work today flame wrasse is missing hope he is just hiding. makes me wonder if I should stop treatment at 21 days. he was eating fine yesterday. everything else looks fine though. man if anybody could come up with a reef safe cure for ick that was 100% they would be a millionaire.
 
Back
Top