Nikon 55-200mm.

[edwing206]

I have read some good reviews on this lens. Would it be good for full tank shots, moving fish shots and corals? The only downside that I read about is that is has slow auto focus. And is the VR version really worth the extra $65? I will be using it for my tank and on a tripod so it really isn't worth the extrad cash is it?
Here is the lens. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0009HN57Y/kenrockwellcom

thanks

 

[jedininja]

Well I dont know about the lens since i'm a cannon guy, but IMO, VR/IS is defiantly worth it anytime you take handheld shots.

 

[edwing206]

Ok. Thanks jedininja.
Any Nikon users have experience with this lens?
thanks

 

[jet_jer]

My copy should be here a a couple days. Hoping to take it to the Zoo this weekend. That and maybe a 24-120mm VR as well.

Jer

 

[edwing206]

Cool. Be sure to post how you like it.

 

[RCBruce]

I am a nikon person in addition to camera store manager and 16 year photographer.
ANY nikon lens is worth the money as nikon glass is the very best. I think all the hoopla created about VR lenses is unneccessary and is just a status symbol among those using cameras as jewelry these days, but if you got money to burn, go for it!

 

[edwing206]

Wiil it work for tank shots?
Pics of moving fish or do I need a different lens?
thanks

 

[jet_jer]

I recieved the lense today but immediatley sent it back as I decided to pay up for the 70-300 VR as I heard and read some ver good things about it. That one comes tomorrow - I'll post pics as I learn about it.

Jer

 

[edwing206]

Sweet. Be sure to post pic with it.
thanks