Mabyboi
New member
I wouldn't worry about it. Enjoy them, they are beautiful clowns.
Will do, I was a little worried when I saw the word "defect". I love these clowns.
I wouldn't worry about it. Enjoy them, they are beautiful clowns.
that big hunched back beauty is one of the nicest colored clowns i've seen.
i'm a fan of the stubby clownfish so these look great to me.
i'd love to have a pair.
i'm not big on killing things either and no matter what fancy name you give it.
when you end somethings life you kill it.
btw lmk if you ever breed these i'd be interested buying some babies.
i know what you're saying about culling.Trust me, culling fish isn't something breeder's want to do, but it is a necessary evil. If you ever start breeding fish, you'll realize it just has to be done. In order to keep captive bred fish "up to par" with wild caught, culling is necessary.
picasso, snowflake, and platinums were bred for their cool colors. I've got no problem with that. Most people (including me) don't cull for misbars, wrong colors, etc. People tend to like them. There is nothing physically wrong with them.
I disagree that our captive bred fish don't have to be up to par with wild fish. We (as breeders) should try to mimic the fish from the wild (minus coloring). Having properly shaped skeletons, correctly sized fins, no over or under bites, etc is important.
I'd guess that his fish didn't come from ORA, C-Quest, Sustainable Aquatics, or any large breeder. The fish has very cool markings, but as soon as it was realized that the fish had a structural defect, it should have been culled. I'm pretty confident those large hatcheries would have. Like I said before, it's not something pretty, and not something that people like doing, but it's a necessary evil. I would rather not see fish that aren't structurally perfect get into the mating pool.