OT: A few shots from today with the d80

Kinetic

Active member
I picked up my D80 from Alan (hyacinth) on Tuesday night, and finally got a chance to go shooting tonight (had to take a break from my crazy work schedule... gresh's seen the schedule, hehe).

THis is my first try using the D80, so the pix aren't very good. The color saturation, better, sensor, etc. on the D80 is a major improvement over my d70 that's for sure. Here are the results:

330790082_789a8ee257.jpg



330789999_699b0755db.jpg



330789575_59db158c79.jpg


full sizes here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kinetic
 
Art,

Nice pics. Also, thanks for letting me come by a take a look at the new system. Should be nice once it gets going.

The attention to detail on the socal tank is impressive.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8815793#post8815793 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by otterpop510
wow.. beautiful pics.. one of these days i'm going to convince myself to buy a nice digital camera..

don't worry, you don't need a good digital camera to take pictures like this. It's all about composition and patience. With even a good disposable camera, you can get pictures that are really amazing. I kid you not.

A professional photographer once was so fed up with people telling her she was good because of her camera, so for two years she shot with disposable. told nobody. then she announced it, and gave proof (she had her camera deposited at a safety deposit box at the bank, and showed records of her not going there for 2 years), and then all the receipts for her processing of a disposable camera.

don't limit yourself just because you don't have a good camera. The following were taken with a really crappy sony of mine:

14283154_999aac6362.jpg



18070874_aadff0b8be.jpg



the pix above were taken with a sony camera poitn and shoot that cost around $90. Seriously, you can do it too w/o expensive cameras.

I shoot about 400 pictures every session, and I go out for about 8 hours or more every session. I believe the time, focus, and dedication you put into capturing a photo is what makes a photo great. You can't expect to walk around for half an hour with a amazing camera to take any of these pictures. You have to make the effort, to get yourself places, to find that perfect composition...

Out of those 400 pix, I only chose 3 that I liked.

that's what you gotta do. don't get an expensive camera. It's basically like using a handsaw compared to a miter saw, but you can still take the shots you want if you work for it.
 
can you give us what detail we need on crappy camera? I have sony cybershot and my pictures are crap comparing to yours hehehehe
 
what are you taking a picture of? if you go out onto the cliff side in the brutal wind / cold for a picture of the golden gate bridge, I'd suggest a tripod. Shutter speed should be as slow as possible, given your cybershot can control that manually (I'm sure it can to a certain extent).

also never use your onboard flash for photos like these, the flash won't even come close to reaching the bridge.

it all depends. so not sure what you're taking a photo of, but goto your subject, and play with the shutter / aperture settings, try framing the picture differently, etc. until you find something very interesting to take a picture of.

having a great camera won't make what you're taking a picture of look better than it is. I can take a crystal clear picture with my expensive camera of a trash can, but no matter what I do, it'll look kinda dumb (unless it looks like this)

You really can't expect pictures to just look good depending on your camera.

so you need to go hunt for that perfect picture. Automatic settings might suffice too.

it's all about the journey or so they say =)

find something cool to take a picture of, take as long as you want, you'll find it.
 
Kinetic, I'm no photographer, but eventually want to get into that hobby down the line. I was just curious how the comparable Canon cameras compare to the Nikons. I've heard that Canons are superb in photography--your thoughts?
 
hey paladin,
Canons are great, and perfectly comparable to Nikons. For every nikon, there is a canon, and vice versa. Either one, you'll get great quality, and neither is better than the other. The only way to choose is to look at external factors:

1. Which camera feels better in your hands? Some cameras are larger, some smaller, some people like the different button formats and such. The thing is, if you don't have any experience, you really won't know. But again, once you start with a Nikon or Canon, it's very improbable that you'll ever switch since you'll get used to either one. Nikons especially since the layout of their cameras are very similar regardless of the model, such that Nikon users feel at home using any camera body. I think a bit moreso than Canon.

2. What do all your friends have? The more friends you have around you using the same brand camera, the better. You can swap lenses, borrow batteries, give each other tips and tricks, and so on. Three of my really good friends all have Nikons, and we share lenses and equipment all the time =)

3. Look at the different lenses for Canon vs. Nikon. Almost every Canon has the same lens as every Nikon and vice versa. But sometimes one lens may be a tad better in a certain focal point / lens type. I believe the nikon 105mm 1:1 macro f/2.8 is better than the canon's, but so slightly that it doesn't make a difference. Canon has a better lens the Nikon too, but they're such slight differences, it's hard to say. But if you're totally into macro, I'd go for Nikon. (sorry, I only know nikon).

There is one thing, some Nikon lenses are VERY hard to come by because sometimes when new lenses come out, Nikon doesn't keep up. Either a marketing ploy to drive prices higher and make things more "rare", or they're just too slow. A great example is the Nikkor 18-200mm VR II lens. It's one of the best lenses out there, totally versatile for walking around and shooting really anything. It has a huge range, and everyone wants it. Problem is, the wait is months! I believe Canon has a readily available one that's the same?

So there are a few things such as that which would sway you one way or another.

But in terms of quality of picture, both are great =)
 
definately trpod. that was a 30 second exposure. people can't usually hold even 1/25th of a second before it shakes. My best is maybe 1/30th of a second =/
 
I was using ISO 100, and I had on a Neutral Density filter to take out about 1 more stop of light. I was basically at F/.8 and ISO 100 ;)

it's pretty bright around there even at night.
 
lens?

lens?

Hi Kinetic, those are great great photos! I settled for the Canon EOS Rebel xti. I want to get a different set of lenses. Which one did you use for the pic of the gg bridge?
 
For those of you that cant afford a canon rebel or a high dollar Nikon, i want to share my experience with you. I just bought a canon A640. This camera is a 10 Mega Pixel where the Rebel is 10.1. My Shutter speed range is from 25 - 1/2500. The rebel is a double that....100-1/4000 i believe. Having said that, i am 100% satisfied with it.

My point is, i paid 300 for the camera, and an additional 150 for a lense kit (3X optical, Macro, Wide Angle and all the common filters). My last photography lesson was in high school with an instant poloroid so i had some catching up to do. The canon A640 is simply amazing when it comes to being user friendly. I am far from being an expert or ever claiming to be and im sure it will be a long time b4 i am able to snap em like Kinetic does.

Here is my point! Dont go all out on a camera that has more controls than youll ever be able to learn. Go slow, start small and enjoy those moments of catching mother nature in her unmolested state. I have a 100 gallon SW tank that i love to take pics of. I just sat up another 100 gallon so i can take more pics. Hell i was even possessed enuff to set up an 85 gallon fresh water, just so i could take pics. So now im stuck with two hobbies that i love to death. Aquatics and photography.

Im not an expert but my recommendation is hit the internet and read up on it. There is a mountain of info out there to learn and its easy as hell.

Here are some of my most recent photos that dont even compare to the ones above, but im getting there. Enjoy!

george2.jpg


george1.jpg


george3.jpg
 
Re: lens?

Re: lens?

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8837817#post8837817 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by maguro88
Hi Kinetic, those are great great photos! I settled for the Canon EOS Rebel xti. I want to get a different set of lenses. Which one did you use for the pic of the gg bridge?

I think I used a 18-200mm Nikkor VR F/3.5-5.6 for that shot. the focal length was around 135mm for the gg shot.
 
Back
Top