OT: Season MVP - Nash

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7256844#post7256844 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by E-A-G-L-E-S
I saw a clear charge...just like the announcers....clear ;)

Thats makes us even. Kobe still has a bump on his forehead from Tim Thomas in GM1 when they "supposdly' striped the ball:smokin:
 
Man, Kwame plowed someone pretty dang hard on the floor a couple minutes ago...and no foul...i thin raja bell was the victim...that's right before Kobe hit the megatron scoreboard befure the monster dunk.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7256890#post7256890 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by E-A-G-L-E-S
"in LA"...lol

MVP does not equal best player...it is not called the most outstanding player is it? no.


Whatever the definition of MVP,

LAKERS WIN!!!!
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7256390#post7256390 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by dattack
Don't listen to Turtlespd. He admitted that he hates Kobe no matter if the Lakers go undefeated. Must hurt jumping off the bandwagon. hehe

OH great i have all oh mighty Laker fan on board now! Remember what happend at ESPN center! I risked my life there! I bet you are going to say that wasnt a charge on that posterized dunk! But the game always has bad calls and im not going to dewell on that. Lakers did play a good game as a team,WOW. ..

I cant get over that dunk, straight nasty.

I never was a ban wagon Laker fan. I been a Laker fan since i was a child. I am still a laker fan but not a KObe fan. reguardless if the lakers are undefeated of kobe is defeated, i will cheer for the lakers and not Kobe! contradicting in a sense but thats how i feel!
 
kobe%20nash.gif
 
This is very similar to the bulls, Jordan can't win championship without Pippen, Kobe can't win championship without Shaq.
But I think Kobe should win the MVP this year for outstanding performent.
 
Wow, this MVP debate thing is so complicated. It's been all over the radio, news and I guess here. Everybody has there own opinion to the definition of "MVP". I careless who gets the "MVP". My main concerned, Lakers win, Lakers advanced, bye bye Suns, and bye bye Canadian boy.

One more thing, if the Lakers win this series, I surely hope they do, then do we still have an argument for who's the "MVP"?

Case closed!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Jordan didn't win without Pippen...but it wasn't only Pippen...look at the stacked rosters, they had good teams. Jordan was an amazing player before he won championships. I don't know if he was MVP at all before, but he was recognized as the best player in the league.

It just makes too much sense to me to rate MVP on the most crucial criterion that if you were to take the specific player off the team, how would the team fair? ESPN ranks Lakers top ten right now. Now seriously, do we really think that Lakers would win 20 games all season long without Kobe? I say no more than 20...I say the same for LeBron. I think Suns are a little step above the Laks and Cavs if all 3 were to disappear. Do I make sense? That's my 2 cents.
 
until the NBA defines MVP..............LOL
M-Most
V-Valuable
P-Player
-its not rocket science, lol

kobe is a great player, but he has just as much talent around him this year and the Suns have a 10x better record....no choice to be made you homers ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7258268#post7258268 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by E-A-G-L-E-S
kobe is a great player, but he has just as much talent around him this year and the Suns have a 10x better record....no choice to be made you homers ;)

Suns won 450 games this year?! That is definately an all time record. Nash for MVP for sure!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top