note: cross-posted here as well:
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=6997189#post6997189
well, if OMAS has no intention of endorsing a list of "good" LFS's, then OMAS should not be considering a list of "bad" LFS's.
let the market decide who the good ones are and who the bad ones are.
Having said that, I agree that OMAS should be working toward providing good, solid information to the new people entering the hobby. you can't reach everyone, but you can make the group's existence known and anyone that wants help can use OMAS as a resource.
the question then becomes how do you make the group's existence known? in my opinion, the best way to do that is to partner with the LFS's. The problem there is that the LFS's tend to have love/hate relationships with hobbyist groups.
Several months ago, i started a thread asking what the LFS's needed to make the relationship workable between OMAS and the LFS's. I can't say that much came out of it.
I think that until there is a strong relationship between the LFS's and OMAS there will be a struggle on both sides. OMAS needs the LFS's in order to reach new members and provide good solid advice to hobbyists. LFS's need OMAS as a support group for the people in the hobby.
Here are a couple ideas:
1 - OMAS could offer to provide an in-store liason to customers. (i doubt this is an idea they would jump on, but it's an idea)
2 - OMAS could offer to provide a class to a store's customers on 1 or 2 Saturdays each month. perhaps a fragging class, or a sump/refugium class, etc. ( i keep hearing stores say they want to provide these classes but i've yet to see one do it... why is that? lack of demand, lack of resources, or lack of follow through?)
enough from the peanut gallery on the left coast...
derek