Cdodge1
New member
That's a tough comparison to make as fruit doesn't need to be quarantined for several weeks to be treated. It's treated with pesticides in the field where it's grown.
The reason is that from a financial position, for a store to be able to "float" that kind of money for that kind of time period is unrealistic and unsustainable from a practical point of view. (I'm a business development manager).
Consider what the cost of corals would be if theoretically, a store was able to do this. Consider the cost of fruit, if the farmers and/or stores couldn't sell their livestock for 6 weeks after harvesting (never mind the lack of stock and assortment). I'm not going to get into details of a business plan to demonstrate, but I think you get the picture.
Now if people were wiling to pay 200-500% more (at least), I'm sure the stores wouldn't mind doing this for you. But my guess would be that given one store practicing this method versus everyone else, customers are going to save themselves the money and take the extra time to dip them on their own (or take their chances).
It's one of those "in a perfect world..." Scenarios.
You bring up some great points. Cost, being the biggest factor.
I get the picture of what you are saying. Again, it's obviously a flawed comparison. Fruit or almost anything I can think of will be inherently different. But the essence of what I am saying still rings true.
If we wouldn't accept a disease ridden or parasite infested (or otherwise flawed) "whatever", whether it be fruit, a puppy from the pet store, food, plants, etc... why do we accept it in this hobby?
I work as a production & testing planner for one of the largest aerospace companies in the world. I have a finance degree. I'm well aware how a general business operates, so believe me, I see the difficulties of what I am proposing. I also see the solutions, however. The goal is to deliver to the customer a perfect product. Particularly when we have the means to prevent flawed products. The logistics of how we get that perfect product is what gives us a competitive advantage. There is no margin for error or an otherwise imperfect product.
But we (the consumer) will continue to receive sub-par products as long as we continue to accept them. This is the major point I want to convey.
It's a controversial topic, I know. And I'm glad we can discuss it without tearing at each others throats haha.