atreis
New member
Green? If you live in a part of the country that has hard water (~400ppm here), but which has plenty of it (like we do here - no shortage here, like in other parts of the country), then this is not a very green idea at all.
Here, a DI cartridge without RO will last 50-100 gallons. So let's assume 100. Let's also assume that the RO unit will consume 3x that amount.
So, with this idea I could either spend a little extra on electricity to pump an additional 200 gallons of water from the ground (my household of 5 consumes about 1000 gallons of water a week, excluding the tank - 200 gallons is really not very much), or I could spend energy on the manufacture, transport, and transport and disposal of waste for the DI resin.
I'll stick with my RO unit.
For those that live somewhere with very soft water (where DI resin alone might last a while) and that is (very) short on fresh water this might make more sense, but if a full lifecycle energy analysis is done, I have my doubts that it could still be considered "green".
Here, a DI cartridge without RO will last 50-100 gallons. So let's assume 100. Let's also assume that the RO unit will consume 3x that amount.
So, with this idea I could either spend a little extra on electricity to pump an additional 200 gallons of water from the ground (my household of 5 consumes about 1000 gallons of water a week, excluding the tank - 200 gallons is really not very much), or I could spend energy on the manufacture, transport, and transport and disposal of waste for the DI resin.
I'll stick with my RO unit.
For those that live somewhere with very soft water (where DI resin alone might last a while) and that is (very) short on fresh water this might make more sense, but if a full lifecycle energy analysis is done, I have my doubts that it could still be considered "green".