shorter photo period = faster growth

Just reporting back to everyone about this theory. I have a couple interesting insights into this idea that I'd like to share...

I just went on spring break this past week to the Florida Keys. I went diving on a live rock farm and helped with seeding and collection. It was awesome, but what happened back at home is a bit more interesting in regard to this topic. I turned the lights back from 12 hours to 6 hours in an attempt to reduce algae growth and evaporation while I was away. As I stated earlier in the thread, I've been having issues with coral growth after increasing my photoperiod from 10 to 12 hours.

While I was in the Keys (Key Largo) I stayed at Dr. Bill Fitt's research lab on the coast. Dr. Fitt was generous enough to give a presentation to my group about his work with the coral reefs there, and it was during this that he brought up a very interesting point.

After over a decade of research, he has found a clear correlation between increased coral growth and reduced lighting and temperature. It was supposed to be just some preliminary research at first, but it produced some surprising results. According to one of the graphs he showed, coral biomass during the winter months (decreased light and temperature) increased to almost 3x the rate of growth during that of the summer months (increased light and temperature). Obviously the summer season is still very important, but I felt that it was an interesting piece of information.

So, when I returned, what did I find? Coral growth had increased by a very large margin. Frags that showed almost absolutely no signs of growth for months had "taken off" and were sprouting new branches all over. Virtually every frag has encrusted to the frag plugs a great deal, and I'm extremely excited to see everything doing so well.

I'll be heading over the lab later today with my camera. I'll take some photos and then put together some before and after shots.
 
xJake, thanks for that information it is a very interesting concept and a new one to hobbyist to say the least, I personally have noticed a definite growth spurt in my corals and much improved coloration since turning back my photoperiod from 8 to 5 hrs. I have had some corals that i couldn't get colored up for years finally start to show signs of coloration.

Again I suspect this approach only really works for tanks that have a ton of light over them, almost too much light in a lot of cases
 
Well...Jump on the wagon I did...
All you really gotta say is faster growth, more color and smaller power bill and man I'm on it!! :D
Lighting breakdown.. 3x 250w SS ballasts, 3x Lumenmax Elites w/20k Radiums..

cycle was at 9 hours of MH and I brought it down today to 6 hours of MH.
1.5 hours of 65w PC-10k- one hour over lapping MH in the morning and evening.
1.5 hours of 65w PC-Actinics-one hour over lapping 10k in the morning and evening.
Small moonlight to fill in the gap...Maybe considering removing the moonlight and doing a blackout.

I have a large RBTA and I will be keeping my eye on him as well to see how he reacts to the changes.

Keep ya posted
 
I have a question now regarding how far the lights should be from our sps.

I have 400w radiums and some of my sps are only 12 inches away from the light. Is this too close for them to grow at a normal/accelerated rate? I have noticed some of my sps at that distance not growing too much. They're not bleaching and I have a 6 hr photo period, but I just don't see much growth. Could the distance of my lights be a reason?
 
I'm now starting to wonder if a lot of the folks who complain about brownish, dull, light colors, are mistaking bad colors on nutrients where in fact it is possible tht it's too much photoperiod

I cut back my photoperiod from 8hrs to 5hrs and now I am dropping down to 4.5 hrs and leaving it there, I gotta tell you I my instance this approach has really worked wonders for my sticks I'm in the 3rd week of 5 hrs and the colors are getting better and better, I also had slow growth but I now atribute that to light oversaturation...I feel like a born again reefer to be honest with you, it's amazing!

I know this approach will not work for everybody, we all know there can be several diffiernt factors to dull our colors but if your spot on with parameters and have no nutrient issues, adding fish and AA's isn't working, I would seriously look into your photoperiod
 
Last edited:
Well I just hit my two week mark today and I thought that I would give a oral report on how things are doing. As far as groth goes nothing that I can tell but I wasnt expecting anything to report on that. Color is starting to darken up a little. I can tell that some of the blues are getting to be a darker nicer blue than before. And everything else is really starting to look nice. I just wish I had taken before pictures so I could really tell. Im sure it has changed more than I can tell but with out a picture to look at Im just guessing or its my mind playing tricks on me. Oh yeah and one more thing Im not having a temp swing like I use to its staying at 79 all the time now.
 
I will try this too. I have been wanting to learn to take better pictures of my tank. I guess this is a good opportunity to give it a shot.
 
You know what..Im gonna have to take some photos too....
I keep walking by my tank only after 2 days, ..
"Man is that a new sprout??"
"Wow is my pink milli getting pinker??"
"Hold on are my acans getting darker??"

LOL ...man your mind sure can play tricks on you...:eek1:
 
I also noticed new growth happening on many of my sps . I have 400 watters on a 120 and many of the corals on the top of the tank actually have somewhat of a washed out appearance. I need to take pics to compare.
Another positive note save on electric bill thats a biggie.
 
What about splitting up the light period between metal halides? I have 260watts of pc actinics and two 250w reeflux 20k MH's. Currently I have the MH come on at the same time and go off at the same time. I wonder If splitting it up would help. I would be shortening the photoperiod for each side of the tank, but of course there will be spill over from the other side and I will keep the actinics on all day instead of off while the halides are on.

Right now I have actinics on at 11am MH's on and actinics off at 1pm MH's off and actinics on at 9pm and actinics off at 11pm.

I am thinking of changing it to actinics on 1pm, 3pm left side MH on, 5pm right side MH on, 7pm left side MH off, 9pm right side MH off, 11pm actinics off.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14636740#post14636740 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by gaetanocallista
Can we establish the "correct short photoperiod"?
actinics 8 hours?
white 6 hours?

I pretty sure what everybody was referring to in this thread was the shortening of the MH and not the supplemental lighting
 
There is no true "correct" photoperiod.

Even in nature different reefs get different intensity and photoperiod depending on where on earth they are, and different reefs have different nutrient levels etc..

I think 6 hours MH seems like a good starting point for most people though, I'm at 5.5 hours MH and it works good for me.
 
I'm at 5 hours of 14K MH and 11 hours of T-5. My T-5 "supplements" are more of a daylight color, rather than just actinic (Fiji Purple / Blue Plus / Aquablue Special x 2.)

I like to enjoy the tank for more hours per day, since I work at home.
 
Back
Top