hi roger,
thanks again for the help with the nanostreams, great customer service!
quick question regarding the silence pumps. i was trying to look at the charts regarding flow with head for the 1073.020 and 1073.040, but they were unclear as to how much flow and i have heard that the charts are a bit overrated.
in doing a quick rc search, there also seemed to be somewhat of a large range of responses regarding flow rates (from 150-250 gph for the .020 at ~5' head; and 350-450 gph for .040 as same head)
i was wondering if you could give me a bit tighter of a range (for example, around 380-420 gph for the .040) in terms of your observations of the flow for each of these pumps at 5' head? (or observations from anyone else who has done measurements on flow for their silence pumps..)
also, how to the pumps compare with the eheim pumps in terms of noise and flow at 5' head? i have an eheim 1250 that is rated on the rc calculator at 134 gph at 5' head, which seems about right when i measured the flow myself. thanks for your assistance!
thanks again for the help with the nanostreams, great customer service!
quick question regarding the silence pumps. i was trying to look at the charts regarding flow with head for the 1073.020 and 1073.040, but they were unclear as to how much flow and i have heard that the charts are a bit overrated.
in doing a quick rc search, there also seemed to be somewhat of a large range of responses regarding flow rates (from 150-250 gph for the .020 at ~5' head; and 350-450 gph for .040 as same head)
i was wondering if you could give me a bit tighter of a range (for example, around 380-420 gph for the .040) in terms of your observations of the flow for each of these pumps at 5' head? (or observations from anyone else who has done measurements on flow for their silence pumps..)
also, how to the pumps compare with the eheim pumps in terms of noise and flow at 5' head? i have an eheim 1250 that is rated on the rc calculator at 134 gph at 5' head, which seems about right when i measured the flow myself. thanks for your assistance!