Soo...who managed to snatch this piece?

IMAG0116.jpg

what do you think Isseym328, navini or gomezi?
 
I've got a green/yellow colored acro that I'm pretty sure is a navini... I didn't think they came in purple/blue.

DSC038091.jpg


DSC028291.jpg


And FWIW, my "gomezi" maricultured ended up looking pretty different after a few years...

April 2007:
gomezi4-28-07.jpg


May 2010:
18_1.jpg


January 2011:
IMG_8966-1.jpg
 
Not a A. navini. The growth formation doesn't support one of A. navini.
http://data.aims.gov.au/coralpages/H...0pages/835.htm

I have this coral in question, and have labelled it A. sekiseiensis (but I also could be wrong but have narrowed it down to this species).
http://data.aims.gov.au/coralpages/H...0pages/862.htm

Im sorry, but it is a navini - they are all from the same cultured stock that Bali has. Over the last 7 years, their cultured species have stayed the same - almost all from the same brood stock.

Navini, austera, tortosa and gomezi's are all very similar in growth pattern and get confused often.
 
could you shed some light on the differences so i can properly identify mine. thanks

Its not only corallites, but also the groth formation of the coral that you should look at when trying to identify them. Ex, A. navini grows in a bushy formation, while A gomezi has stag like branches. The corallites are very similar, but the growth is much different.
 
Im sorry, but it is a navini - they are all from the same cultured stock that Bali has. Over the last 7 years, their cultured species have stayed the same - almost all from the same brood stock.

Navini, austera, tortosa and gomezi's are all very similar in growth pattern and get confused often.

Sure... lets completely disregard the actual description of A. navini and go with what people in Bali culture.

I am not doing that.
 
With all of you and reefcentral as my witnesses, i am officially giving up on id'ing acros.
SDguy, I was a tort, austera guy but i think your gomezi has started another love affair
 
Sure... lets completely disregard the actual description of A. navini and go with what people in Bali culture.

I am not doing that.

The description and the skeleton photo pretty well matches the colony in the picture, however?

Also the navini described has a bushy form and your sekiseiensis seems to have more of a different, staghorn form.
 
The description and the skeleton photo pretty well matches the colony in the picture, however?

Also the navini described has a bushy form and your sekiseiensis seems to have more of a different, staghorn form.
they are all baby pictures though and the veron pics are of colonies, but whatever, i dont id corals anymore
 
In very simplistic terms:

navini: bushy
seki: not bushy, stag-like

The picture in this thread showed of one that forms stag-like branches. Therefore it is quite simple to say that it is a A. seki. In fact, I have both at home and they are quite different once they reach colony size.
 
With all of you and reefcentral as my witnesses, i am officially giving up on id'ing acros.
SDguy, I was a tort, austera guy but i think your gomezi has started another love affair

Hehe, thanks. But you can still consider yourself a tort guy, since it ended up looking like a tort!
 
Your welcome Brian. All it takes is some practice and time in the hobby, and you'll be able to id stuff like the best of them.

Aquacultured sps prices have been coming down too. I was able to pick up a sweet piece at the LFS recently for $45.
 
I've got a green/yellow colored acro that I'm pretty sure is a navini... I didn't think they came in purple/blue.

DSC038091.jpg


DSC028291.jpg


And FWIW, my "gomezi" maricultured ended up looking pretty different after a few years...

April 2007:
gomezi4-28-07.jpg


May 2010:
18_1.jpg


January 2011:
IMG_8966-1.jpg


Yep, these are good and accurate pictures of an acropora gomezi. The first picture at the start of this thread doesn't look like a gomezi.
 
Sure... lets completely disregard the actual description of A. navini and go with what people in Bali culture.

I am not doing that.

Im not disregarding the actual coral description...the coral is not A. sekiseiensis - the coralites are not even close to being the same (rounded) as the OP's picture. Also, you are basing your guess off of pictures of much larger wild colonies - the coral shown is a budding and completely different in growth pattern. This has been called a navini for a very long time - even well reputable shops who deal with more acros in a day than you and I see in year ID it as just that. Im not saying corals don't get mislabeled as we have seen this often in Bali, but in this case - this appears not to be one of them.
 
Im not disregarding the actual coral description...the coral is not A. sekiseiensis - the coralites are not even close to being the same (rounded) as the OP's picture. Also, you are basing your guess off of pictures of much larger wild colonies - the coral shown is a budding and completely different in growth pattern. This has been called a navini for a very long time - even well reputable shops who deal with more acros in a day than you and I see in year ID it as just that. Im not saying corals don't get mislabeled as we have seen this often in Bali, but in this case - this appears not to be one of them.

You must have missed the part where I stated that I have both corals in question, so I am not making a guess. Secondly, I see more corals shipped into our city than the average reefer, so I do know what gets cultured and packaged en masse. Often then not, people in Bali do not know the exact latin name for a coral species. Most of them give assumptions. They do not take the time to get it right. I know this, as I have imported corals myself. So I take everything what people say from Bali with a lot of salt.

We can discuss this through infinity, but I rather let the reefer who wants to know the ID to make his choice. I only can show them what I know and have experienced. I do not gain anything from this, except for feeling good that I have helped a fellow reefer out.
 
Back
Top