Yes
Neptune, I did do those. You made me scrape the front of my bug-out tank to get a picture, lol
I just took this - as you can see they are both alive.
As I said earlier, there is no growth or division yet, but it has been less then two weeks. The shroom and the star polyps seem to be doing well, but I need to move them up a little - 15W and at the bottom isn't conducive to growth. Note that the mushroom was not glued down, but netted down - it attached on its own in a few days.
Yeah, CaCl won't drop pH - as it turns out, CaCl is simply an accelerator of the "set", not the "harden", which are different. To quote from Nick:
Setting is the process by which the concrete stops being plastic.
However, set concrete may have little strength. It is hardening that relates to strength growth.
From what I understand, CaCl is most often used in cold climes, where freezing or undue cold would normally effect the pour - by "setting" quickly, it allows the cement to finish hydrating without worries about temp interfering.
After reading up on it, I've come to the conclusion that all CaCl will do is allow you to remove the piece from the mold quicker - it does not speed the cure of the cement, or at least not significantly.
And all I can say is that I know Michealalan tried several batches with micro-silica, even going as high as 20% with it, and saw no reduction of pH. I do not think he used CaCl, which may be the "magic combo".
But I find it funny that Reefballs still has folks kuring their pieces, don't you? Someone mentioned them maybe "covering their butts", but if this method always works, why would they need to cover their butts?
I think that came about because Reefballs started out as a reef replacement system, and hobbyist saw the method and wanted to reproduce it at home, but since these aren't being dumped in the ocean, then they still need a kure as the pH will still be too high.
And no disrespect to Cayars, but I am from Missouri - you have to "Show Me". We all read about claims made everyday by companies, people, etc. that just aren't true. I'm not saying this is the case, but until we have a few reports that confirm the addition of micro-silica and CaCl, I am going to be a sceptic, and not advocate something I can't say for sure works. I think it irresponsible to recommend the use of something I am not 100% on. Heck, I had to get others to reproduce the Jiffy Rock method before I felt convinced it worked as well for others as it did for me. I'm all for testing it, don't get me wrong (and am sort of excited about it too), and will do a battery of tests when I get my batch from Neptune, but I don't think anyone should be celebrating just yet
And as far as strength and perlite, dumping uncured cement in water is not going to help it cure - while moisture is needed to hydrate, O2 is also needed, and it can't get it out of the water as easily as it can out of the atmosphere, so basically, when you put it in water before the 7-14 days Quickcrete recommended (and almost everything else I've read), you are actually delaying (prolonging) the cure of the rock. And until it is cured, it won't kure.
And as a side note about CaCl and kuring. My Jiffy Rock method includes a weak acetic acid bath - 3 days, immediately following the cool down (and salt release if salt is used). Basically, the rock goes into acid within 48 hours of being cast. This brings the pH down to 9. I have tried on two test rocks with CaCl (but not baked/steamed) to reproduce this, and both times have failed completely (the pH stubbornly stayed above 11) - another reason that I do not think that CaCl on its own will produce the desired results.