This should scare us all...

crazy. I wish hobbyist and retailers alike would know that there is no such thing as a bright yellow anemone.
 
i have never seen a dyed coral in person. why am i not surprised it is happening in the
areas where corals naturally live/grow. after all, there is plenty more where that came from
sorta thinking going on.

really no different when ladies hats were in style and they would hunt a bird down
mercilessly to get the feathers to make a silly hat look pretty. Fashion styles would
change next season and the hat was no longer desirable.

"Lacey Act - Feather Trade
The fashion of wearing bird feathers in women’s hats began in the court of Louis XVI of France when Marie Antoinette appeared in a headdress with feather plumes (Doughty 1975). The fashion gradually spread in Europe and later in the colonies of the United States. By 1850, the business of killing birds for the millinery trade was practiced on a large scale, involving the deaths of hundreds of thousands of birds in many parts of the world. Egrets were a prime target, especially birds in breeding plumage when their most elegant plumage was displayed. Hunters killed adult birds, leaving the chicks to die in the scorching sun. Sometimes feathers were pulled from wounded birds, which were left to die of exposure or starvation. Herons and other wading birds along the east coast and in the Everglades were slaughtered in huge numbers. Songbirds were also popular, and entire birds were stuffed and exhibited on the hats of Victorian women. The plumage of terns and gulls was commonly used, and entire breeding colonies numbering more than 10,000 birds were killed. One New York woman negotiated in 1884 with a Parisian millinery to deliver 40,000 or more bird skins; she hired gunners to kill as many terns as possible at ten cents a skin (Doughty 1975). "
 
This is why our hobby that we cherish so much will be banned inevitably because of jacka**es like this who think it is cool and fashionable and that it is a endless resource like fossil fuels:( Pardon my french but things like this get me stirred up...:mad2::furious::mtool:
 
At least the glo-fish aren't being slowly starved and tortured to death. Glo-fish are genetically mutated, so they're typically normal, happy little fish. These corals however, are a totally different story..

That is disgusting.
 
My brother had done some research on dyed corals for school, but had never explained much of it to me. I cant believe people can really think like this. It completely changes the point in having a reef tank.

This is why our hobby that we cherish so much will be banned inevitably because of jacka**es like this who think it is cool and fashionable and that it is a endless resource like fossil fuels:( Pardon my french but things like this get me stirred up...:mad2::furious::mtool:

Im in the same boat. I will be severely Pi**ed off if our hobby dies because of people like that. They just give us a bad name.
 
A real reefer would and does have the most colorful corals in his aquarium like SPS if he wants bright colors. These idiots who are doing this are not real reefers or hobbyist. Although the coral mag article does make a good point. It says that in our country that the equipment to keep these corals is cheap, because they are made on our doorstep here in this country, but the corals are not and need to be flown in and are expensive thus making our keeping of them that much more cherished. In the countries that this is fashionable in the equipment has to be flown in from around the world and it costs an arm and a leg whereas the corals are right on their doorstep making it seem like it is a renewable resource and that its ok to replace them every month like some people do skimmers and equipment. In no way does it make it right, but it does explain why this is happening. :( It is still so sad to see though; and glo-fish are relatively 'happy' (if we can tell if a fish is truly happy) may not be so bad on the fish it's the ones that are tatoo'd on valentines day with hearts on them that make me sick.
 
I just puked in my mouth... That is so ****ed up. They should list the name of the place that they took the picture at so we can go kill them! I didn't read it mostly because it's like a horror story but i assume they injected them with dye? I remember in school putting brockle, carrets and celery in cups of colored water, but we then ate them.
 
glo-fish are relatively 'happy' (if we can tell if a fish is truly happy) may not be so bad on the fish it's the ones that are tatoo'd on valentines day with hearts on them that make me sick.

I agree 100%. Since the glo-fish are genetically engineered to be bio luminescent, they really don't suffer at all from the mutation and don't know the difference. However, as Steve mentioned, it has recently become a sickening trend to literally tattoo several freshwater and brackish fish species such as tetras, cichlids and mollies. That is animal cruelty, and it is wrong, no matter how dispensable an inexpensive fresh water fish may seem to be to some people. :furious:
 
I believe you have all summed up my thoughts exactly! I hadn't heard much about the 'glo-fish' and tattooed fish though. Sickening. Can you all imagine the uproar if someone started to dye dogs different colors. Not just the hair, as that is done a little now, but the whole dog. Skin and organs and all. There would be a worldwide problem with this, (Not that everyone feels 'north american' about the dogs role in society, but still it is a well respected animal almost everywhere.)
 
"Anyone who wants something to match the sofa cushions is advised to keep plastic corals – easy to keep, robust, and available in any color" :lol:
 
This is just ridiculous. Can't anyone just leave things the way they are? First it starts out with modding their cars, then their trucks, then their houses, then cats, dogs, so on and so forth.......and now we're at coral. wth
 
Back
Top