Tiny Might skimmer rockin'

You can get 2 skimmer bodies and cups out of a 5 ft section. Cut the tube in 4 pieces. Two 6 in, two 24 in. Most places will cut the sections for 5 bucks a piece.
 
I'm guessing RK2 wont sell us the thermoformed acrylic tubes he makes. He heats and rolls sheet to make his large tubes.

Otherwise you'd have to get them from an old lab (Bill has probably got the hookup there:) ) or from a manufacturer like Reynolds for $$$$$
 
Do you really think the advantage of round over square is that great when we're talking about skimmers this short and wide? I think that would be worth testing for sure! If you could use $100 worth of 1/2" thick cast acrylic sheet instead of $1000 for a 30" length of 20" tube, this would be a seriously cost efficient skimmer!
 
I didn't say it was cheaper or for everyone. I just said it was the better route for pumps like the sequence with NW.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7865758#post7865758 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kentrob11
Are you refering to the air the pump draws on it's own or with the air pump? Would you think that 2 tinymights on a 5ft skimmer body be too much? You'll have to forgive me here- I'm still trying to build a cost analysis in my head that has this setup beating the pants out of a Deltec AP1004 yet costing half as much....

the tiny might drawing aire on its own. but you have to consider that my tiny might is not modified as much as smjtkj's tiny might is. i only changed out the wheel for the needle wheel. where he did some extensive work to the housing. which i will do once i have done everything i can to advance the wheel using the stock housing. at some point in time i plan to modify the housing and also use 2 tiny mights on a skimmer. it would be great to see how big of a skimmer these pumps could handle. its a slow process and testing over time will tell if this will make a good DIY alternative to the multi pump skimmers.
 
Understood...Here is my thought process at this point. It seems to me that the benefit of using round acrylic cylinders for skimmers was the fact that the turbulence inside them cause bubble collision in square bodied skimmers. Now if we have a 24" square body above a bubble diffuser eliminating most of the turbulence, would it not make sense that maybe a square skimmer would be just as effective as a round one of the same size?
 
as time progresses i feel there will be better alternatives out there for tubing that is less expensive. i have talked with dgasmd and a couple of other r/c members about a good alternative. they all agree its worth a try. but i dont want to talk about it right now. i dont have the time to devote to the research and testing of it right now.
the tube im getting to use on energys skimmer is a used tube. bill wann helped me get it for a steal. bet its the only one he could get. so dont even thing there is more out there to get.
 
Kentrob,
I have always felt this way about square stuff:) It does take more work to build square, but at these sizes, it will definitely be easier to justify the cost savings vs time spent gluing.
If you think about it, it takes no more time to glue up a huge box than a small one.
 
Spazz, I agree.
The rotomolded poly tanks like RK2 and Emporer use are a great setup, IMO. It'd be easy to put a window in those too.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7866666#post7866666 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by H20ENG
Spazz, I agree.
The rotomolded poly tanks like RK2 and Emporer use are a great setup, IMO. It'd be easy to put a window in those too.

no thats not the direction im headed. i want a clear see through body.
 
HUGE WORD OF CAUTION

I came home to a problem today that I want to alert others of before they go spending money like I did in a product they thought was good. I bought the air pump I am using in my current skimmer about a year ago. It is the Sweetwater SL-94 from Aquatic Ecosystems. I am sure you have all heard of the place. When I was buying my pump, I had basically narrowed it down to two choices: The pump above and the Alita pump (bigger model). Price was comparable, but the thing that differentiated them was that the Alita repair kits (diaphragms that need replacing about every 12-18 months) were hard to find and most places seemed to be out of stock at the time. I could not even find how much they cost to begin with. The Sweetwater pumps had readily available repair kits at AES for what I thought was an exorbitant amount of $75. About 3 weeks ago, I needed to replace the diaphragms as one of them broke. I ordered 2 repair kits: one to use and one to keep for future needs. The pumps started to work great again until today when I found that a diaphragm was broken again. I can see after a year, but after 2-3 weeks it is simply ridiculous. I already sent an email out to the customer service manager at AES about getting another replacement sent to me, which at the very least I expect to be free. I will let everyone know how this goes as I have found this company now to be extremely difficult to deal with in the past when it came to replacement/customer service. Maybe I have been spoiled by companies with superb customer service like PA and other, but I don't think I am out of line here. I'll let you know how this turns out.

In the meantime, I would have to say that maybe looking for alternative sources of air pumps is pretty necessary. If you can find a good source of repair kits for the Alita, I would seriously consider them before the Sweetwater any day of the week.
 
I wouldn't mind PVC if they made a 24" width with a 1/4" or even 1/2" thick wall on it. Otherwise it's too frikin heavy to work with!
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7866705#post7866705 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kentrob11
I wouldn't mind PVC if they made a 24" width with a 1/4" or even 1/2" thick wall on it. Otherwise it's too frikin heavy to work with!

that is the problem with most big skimmers. you need a forklift to move them around. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Dgasmd, Boy, I haven't heard anything bad about the sweetwaters, but AES was great about replacing defective air stones. Hopefully they will come thru! I second the vote for Alita. I love my Alita pump!
Mike
 
Spazz- does your idea for larger cylinders involve acrylic or some other material? You don't have to go into details, I'm just curious....
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7865403#post7865403 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by spazz
hahn I don't have a problem with you playing the devils advocate. that is always helpful in any new design. but then you need to say a lot more than what you did. give alternative ideas not just a sentence that says "I think bubble plates are overused in many skimmers where they aren't needed" with no information to base this statement on. if you have information that will help make us understand why we shouldn't use diffusers than by all means post this info. that is what these threads are all about. I think you understand where im coming from. I always ask the question "why". I cant help it. its in my nature.

Cool. I have no problem explaining my viewpoint or reasoning 'why' if it helps, well... I kind of do. Nothing to do with you guys, but I have expressed this reasoning before in other threads. There is a DIY needlewheel thread where I did just mention my reasons why, and I got blasted by someone for being too technical...lol. Its kinda hard to condense, or just give the concept w/o giving the quantitative reasoning behind the idea. I have mentioned it at least two times before, and so I just didnt want to sound like I was repeating myself again and starting to sound like a broken record. I was putting together a jpeg with diagrams and equasions that should give a good reasoning behind the viewpoint though...

That way in the future I can just post the IMG link and let people see what Im really talking about. I am waiting on some numbers from Calfo and company though on bouyant acceleration, terminal velocity, etc.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7866908#post7866908 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kentrob11
Spazz- does your idea for larger cylinders involve acrylic or some other material? You don't have to go into details, I'm just curious....

no comment for now. ;)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7866586#post7866586 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kentrob11
Understood...Here is my thought process at this point. It seems to me that the benefit of using round acrylic cylinders for skimmers was the fact that the turbulence inside them cause bubble collision in square bodied skimmers. Now if we have a 24" square body above a bubble diffuser eliminating most of the turbulence, would it not make sense that maybe a square skimmer would be just as effective as a round one of the same size?

I totally agree with you and Chris on the Square skimmers, in this size range, with diffusers.... factor that with the molded transitions into a round neck the down side is minimal. Plus the added volume (22%) of the square body with the same foot print, cost,.... really air bubble are now so cheep with this new pumps. it is definitely to be look at closer IMO.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7867517#post7867517 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Travis
dgasmd, didn't mojo have persistent diaphram problems with his air pump also?

His was not a Sweetwater II, but it was another type of sweetwater pump.
 
Back
Top