Craig Lambert
Premium Member
Yikes...It's come to skimate pictures......Try it as aftershave, one swipe and you're good for the whole day.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6969153#post6969153 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by NoSchwag
That's because you are not letting stuff break down. <--- that's a dry joke.. get it, dry?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6969042#post6969042 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by ckfazz
jeffbrig - Could you explain this a little further? I don't understand how the reaction time would not be affected by wet skimming since your water column is higher in the main body of the skimmer and then almost immediately entering the collection cup.
With dry skimming, the reaction time in the water column is longer due to the foam taking longer to move to the collection cup. Also, would the foam being produced create a second contact "zone" since it is still touching the water column?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6970211#post6970211 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by RichConley
Nothing breaks down and goes back into your tank in dry skimming. It doesnt just magically migrate back down from the foam into your tank.
On either method, once it gets stuck to a bubble, its gone, period. Its not affecting your tank sitting on top of a collumn of foam, and its not affecting your tank in a bucket of watery skimmate.
They are both the same as far as initial export goes.
As to longevity, wet seems better to me, simply because your neck stays cleaner, and a dirty neck ruins skimming performance.
In this theory, wouldn't the wet skimmate be more diluted due to the increased volume of water left in it? If so, then you would actually be pulling the same amount of organics with either method, correct? For example, wet skimming is pulling 1 cup of skimate per day that contains 1/2 a cup of organics. Dry skimming is producing 2/3 cup of skimmate that contains 1/2 cup of organics. In this theory, they are both pulling the same amount of organics but in a different volume of water. My theory is probably completely off but it is how I am beginning to understand this. It seems like the only advantage, which is a decent one, to wet skimming is the maintenance of the skimmer.if you had the same volume of wet skimmate and dry skim then the dry would have removed mroe organics, but what happens when you wet skim you remove more volume over a shorter period of time, so in theory the increased volume will increase more overall organics.
NoSchwag - How would the particulates break down in your tank if you are dry skimming but not if you are wet skimming? The same water is entering the skimmer through either method which woud mean the same organics are entering the body, being collected by the foam and deposited into the collection cup. If you have a high load of nutrients in the tank, both methods would "react" to pull the excess out of the water column. This is one of the major things that is confusing me.