toofrigginswt
New member
Joe,
What bulb combination do you have in each of your fixtures?
What bulb combination do you have in each of your fixtures?
Not true.
I have Pacific Sun 200W Anniversary edition LED fixtures over my smaller tank- for about 18 months.
If I run them at 50% they are ok. If I hit 100%, they bleach every single SPS in the tank, including those on the floor of the tank at 30" deep.
LED's have no problem punching deep.
Mo
Not a photo of a 36 inch tank, but . . . .
Here's a shot of my tank. It's only 24 inches, but I would note that I moved my lights up from 4 inches above the water to 10 inches above the water because the light was too intense on the bottom, reaching 400+ umol/m2/sec before turning on the 4 x 150 watt MHs and I prefer readings of 100 to 200 on the bottom. Given that I was easily able to generate 400 at 24 inches and the fact that on average PAR readings drop from 400 to 100 with about 12 inches in depth change, I am fairly confident that this fixture with 16 T5 lamps could easily hit 100 umol/m2/sec at 36 inches of depth. I'm actually planning a totally new tank for this spring so maybe I'll go back to a deep tank and test this theory for myself
Joe
![]()
Hi Joe,
What do you define as too intense and what effects did you notice?.
Thanks
Mo
Joe,
What bulb combination do you have in each of your fixtures?
Joe do you have a build thread as I would really like to learn more about your amazing setup. Very inspirational to me.
I would say a tank with a radium bulb set up over it. Joe why 2 fixtures? It costs twice as much to replace all the t5's so why did you go with 2 over just 1 fixture?
No worries mate! I love a good discussion.
First, as I'm sure you would agree the lack of a deep T5 tank is not ipso facto proof of the inability to do the job.
Second let's consider basic physics.
A photon having a wavelength of x doesn't care how it was produced. A 420nm photon from a T5 has just as much chance of reaching 36 inches as a 420nm photon produced by a metal halide lamp. The penetration of a light source is a function of the photon flux (density) and photon wavelength. We have at our disposal a common meter used in the hobby made by Apogee that tells us once we add 6+ tubes of T5 light in a tight row we begin to see densities of photons at the surface equal to those produced by 400 watt metal halide lighting. Is it the same as 1000 watt metal halide lighting? No. Is it practical for a 1000 gallon public aquarium to use several dozen T5s? No.
Will an 8 bulb T5 fixture grow coral at 36 inches in a home aquarium? You bet,
because the photon density at the surface will easily reach 1500 umol/m2/sec and that is enough to create 100 umol/m2/sec at the bottom of a 36 inch tank.
Sadly I don't have any photos of such a tank, but I'll keep looking :reading:
If you were to keep a log with photos, you might have some ground breaking work here because although your comments are similar to the long held consensus the only study of which I am aware that actually examined this belief found the exact opposite:
Again I am in no way trying to be "smarmy", I'm only interested in learning the facts as best we know them today. Funny thing is they keep changing year to year in our hobby :beer:
Joe
this is NOT the cheapest or most efficient setup one can have, but the results are worth it to me
This graph was in the red light quote from post #33 but the link got lost so I am reposting it here as I feel it is critical to understanding the discussion for anyone trying to follow along.
Cheers,
Joe
![]()
Not a photo of a 36 inch tank, but . . . .
Here's a shot of my tank. It's only 24 inches, but I would note that I moved my lights up from 4 inches above the water to 10 inches above the water because the light was too intense on the bottom, reaching 400+ umol/m2/sec before turning on the 4 x 150 watt MHs and I prefer readings of 100 to 200 on the bottom. Given that I was easily able to generate 400 at 24 inches and the fact that on average PAR readings drop from 400 to 100 with about 12 inches in depth change, I am fairly confident that this fixture with 16 T5 lamps could easily hit 100 umol/m2/sec at 36 inches of depth.
I'm actually planning a totally new tank for this spring so maybe I'll go back to a deep tank and test this theory for myself![]()
I remember reading your tank thread, the new lights must have thrown me off. Sorry but I think your tank looked better when you were running the 250's and 400's radiums. Your tank still looks good just think it looked better back then.
I do as well.
Reef on! :beer:
Here! Here! Well said, and I agree with everything.
What I really want is a 6 bulb T5 from ATI with 3 banks of LEDs on the edges and middle to provide shimmer and penetration during noontime and moonlight with moon phase at night all the above with an onboard controller and quality cooling.
Now that would be my ultimate fixture!
Joe
coming soon....http://www.atinorthamerica.com/powermodule.php
They are out now
I would to see your set up as I have spoken with three off the top led makers and all have advised me to install two of ther fixtures to achieve good dept penetration. I do think they will work in time but right now I will wait it out.
Looking forward to seeing your set up.
It's recovering from a bleaching episode"¦.. :beer:
Mo