reverendmaynard
New member
Well, I can point to a very respected expert (Bob Fenner) who is a firm believer that hypo is NOT an effective cure for ick. Copper is more proven, IMO, but also kills many fish as well, either through improper application or just sensitive fish.
I'm glad to hear your powder brown came through, but there is no possible way that you KNOW that he would have died without treatment. Or that another treatment method wouldn't have been just as effective. Also, if whatever it had was "proven to be 100% fatal wihtout treatment" (as if there were such a thing in this hobby), that's an entirely different thing than ick. If you're willing to accept the anecdotal evidence of succesfull treatments, why are you dismissing the anecdotal evidence of those who say they don't treat and it goes away on it's own?
You can post as much anecdotal "proof" as you like about succesfull attempts at medication, but if I was of a mind I could post just as much "proof" that medications and the procedures used to deliver them, have killed many, many fish. IMO, ick is rarely fatal in otherwise healthy fish, and the mortality rates of the treatments are much higher than the ick itself. So, in that light, I would not pull a fish into a qt tank and treat it for a mild case of ick BECAUSE I care about them, not because I don't. It seems everyone else (or most anyway) is saying the same thing.
On your last comment...
So, assuming that there was a human disease that many believe could be treated with formalin (but really wasn't proven in any rigorous scientific fashion), you would feel comfortable dipping your child in it based on your own diagnosis, using OTC product of indeterminate age and efficacy, prepared by you, without ever having so much as spoken to a qualified physician about the problem? To each his/her own, I guess.
I'm glad to hear your powder brown came through, but there is no possible way that you KNOW that he would have died without treatment. Or that another treatment method wouldn't have been just as effective. Also, if whatever it had was "proven to be 100% fatal wihtout treatment" (as if there were such a thing in this hobby), that's an entirely different thing than ick. If you're willing to accept the anecdotal evidence of succesfull treatments, why are you dismissing the anecdotal evidence of those who say they don't treat and it goes away on it's own?
You can post as much anecdotal "proof" as you like about succesfull attempts at medication, but if I was of a mind I could post just as much "proof" that medications and the procedures used to deliver them, have killed many, many fish. IMO, ick is rarely fatal in otherwise healthy fish, and the mortality rates of the treatments are much higher than the ick itself. So, in that light, I would not pull a fish into a qt tank and treat it for a mild case of ick BECAUSE I care about them, not because I don't. It seems everyone else (or most anyway) is saying the same thing.
On your last comment...
So, assuming that there was a human disease that many believe could be treated with formalin (but really wasn't proven in any rigorous scientific fashion), you would feel comfortable dipping your child in it based on your own diagnosis, using OTC product of indeterminate age and efficacy, prepared by you, without ever having so much as spoken to a qualified physician about the problem? To each his/her own, I guess.