Why do poeple use reef crystals?

I have never seen a bucket of salt match parameters that are on bucket yet. Not even close either. I used IO and coral pro. I have to dose water change water to match tank. Or I would actually be lowering parameters in the tank when doing WC. Frustrating to say the least.
 
IO is closer to where I want things to be. I have used HW Reefer and RC in the past but my tank does just as well with IO and my dosing expense is not any different that I can tell.
 
Does anyone actually think using RC versus IO is the difference between a successful tank and a failed one?
 
Here's my .02

IO will provide you with the basic nutrients for successful growth.

If your tank is lacking a certain supplement, it is far easier (and cheaper) to add that specific nutrient with dosing.

That being said, if you use RC, you guarantee that you will be adding X amount of nutrients with every water change, and in most cases, you don't need all the nutrients that the RC is providing, thus leading to an overabundance in a certain nutrient.

From what I have heard in person.. it is far easier to add the nutrients you are lacking via dosing, rather than taking out all the buildup of stuff you don't need.


Plus RC is like 2X the cost of IO.
 
Does anyone actually think using RC versus IO is the difference between a successful tank and a failed one?

Does anyone actually think any single point of reference is the difference between a successful tank and a failed one?
I mean, besides the presence of water, salt, light, and flow... it's all debatable, man.
 
I think if you will be relying on water changes to keep parameters in line then a salt with higher levels of cal, mag, and alk may be worth the money. Maybe lol! I'm switching to plain IO on my 220 build. I have a calcium reactor and can dose kalk if necessary or wanted.

Important thing is to know your parameters and check them regularly. Which I'm awful at...
 
RedStangGA that is the reason that I'm using RC now. It's still not to the point of dosing to be cheaper than the RC. Besides a WC is much easier than playing with all of the extra reactors etc.
 
Exactly why I use RC over regular IO. A year into my tank and I only need to sparingly dose anything(heavily stocked LPS's). Weekly WC's keep my parameter in check. I do on occasion have to top up calcium or alkalinity, but that's like once a month.
 
I was never comfortable with the Ca and Kh swing of doing a 20-25% water change with RC. But now that I do continuous automated water changes, I like the higher parameters of RC.
 
Does anyone actually think any single point of reference is the difference between a successful tank and a failed one?
I mean, besides the presence of water, salt, light, and flow... it's all debatable, man.

I actually think there are a lot of things that can spell disaster for a reef tank -I'm just not convinced that the salt mix one chooses is one of them. Just my opinion, of course.
 
Has anyone ever mixed rc and io?

They both measure at .5 cup to 1 gal water.

Couldn't you just tone down the params levels by adjusting the ratio as needed?
 
Has anyone ever mixed rc and io?

They both measure at .5 cup to 1 gal water.

Couldn't you just tone down the params levels by adjusting the ratio as needed?

I guess it depends on what you want to tone down. AFAIK the only parameter which is generally too high is Alk, and I find them both to be way too high in Alk so mixing wouldn't help.
 
Back
Top