Joe the painter
New member
wow very cool and inspiring!!!!
Looks fantastic. Care to explain a bit on the white silicon bottom? Did the tank manufacturer install that, or is that something you did? Any idea of what brand was used? Very curious for my next build ... love the look
The silicon was applied by the tank manufacturer at my specifications. The silicon is ordinary aquarium silicon but white. That's all. It looks fantastic (I do like it a lot) and no pink algae will attach to it...
Hard to tell....is it smooth or rough finish? Any better pics / close ups?
Had you seen this done before? Any links to other info on it?
Thanks in advance!
¨I use it .. about 3 or 4 liters in my previous system .. and it does filter .. but it makes the first part of the Filtration .. ammonia to nitrite and nitrite to nitrate .. therefore (at least in my experience ) it´s a nitrates generator¨
There is no question that Siporax, bioballs, biobale, etc. create nitrate in the sump from ammonia and nitrite, as you have correctly stated. The issue is that they ONLY create nitrate.hugorsf said:I allways use siporax, eheim substract and bioballs and live rock in my sump and i think live rock is the worst biological filtration material doing the job and to clean!
So again: what stops denitrifyng bactéria to be in siporax?! The flow is the same, the porosity is equivalent, ...Assumption 2: The Interior Of The Rock Contains Denitrifying Bacteria
This is probably the easiest of the assumptions to validate. Most authorities (see Capone, et al., 1992) consider that such bacteria are ubiquitous. They are likely found in virtually all habitats at least in small numbers, but thrive in almost all areas where the conditions are to their liking. The inside of the live rock would be a good place for them, and it appears that they are probably there (Risk and Muller, 1983). It would seem that the assumption that live rock contains the appropriate denitrifying bacteria is therefore valid.