Come on man ! all you are basing your posts on is a pic of the mother colony, from the top, under ALOT of water ripples ...
what is the point of this ? we dont even know the goegraphical location of this ! you dont have pics of other angles, you REALLY can not judge or call anyone wrong or right based on the info we have, unless u have seen that colony in person ... other than that, alot of corals that are nown to NOT table, do Table in my tank, does it mean they changed their genes ? No ...
to me it seems like ure just arguing for no reason.
Oh come on Allmost, you aren't being very fair here. I'm not arguing for no reason, I'm not even arguing (prior to this post). We are having a conversation and I happen to disagree. It really isn't that hard to get a "general" Id of most corals. It just takes a little common sense and some deduction.
While I agree I can't tell you the EXACT species with 100% certainty. It's not that hard to get a general idea of what species it may be, or better yet what it isn't. Which is all I have done. I listed 2 possible species, and stated what it generally is, and then stated there is no way that it is 2 other species that were only suggested based on the posters perception of what the photographer had posted in the past, not based on any reference or attempt to actually id the coral.
So lets take emotion out of this and look at the facts.
The center of the picture is perfectly clear. What we see in the picture is a large tabling acropora, upper reef, dense uniform growth, tightly packed corralites with a cupping U shape to them. While the colour of the coral is most like redish/brown that may not help us in pinning down a species it does help us in ruling out a number of species.
What more do you need? If look at all the coral taxonomy books all images are of corals in the wild, so clearly this is the best reference for matching them up (a picture of a species in the wild) vs a captive grown picture. That is outside of having the coral in hand and a micrometer.
Based on location in the ocean (depth), and growth formation we can rule out any Stags, or deep water species. Based on general growth shape we can rule out a number of specific species that tend to grow in isolated colonies, and not "table" out. We can also rule out any "pure plating, or encrusting" species due to it's combination of tabling and branching.
While we don't know the location of the coral, we can deduce by OP's posts (or simply ask him) that the picture was taken probably somewhere in the middle east/gulf, or maybe the Philippines.
So with that said, dig into
http://sdmas.com/corals
Look for species that Fit the above characteristics and I bet you can narrow it down to about 5 species. From there if we get location I wouldn't be surprised if you can narrow it down to 2-3 species.
It's really not that hard, it's just a little time consuming but after a while you start to notice patterns that make for easier association and recognition.