maxxII
Super Housemonkey!
:fun4: algae scrubber win
In your system.
Not in mine.
Every system is different.
:fun4: algae scrubber win
In your system.
Not in mine.
Every system is different.
Maxx, Just wondering if you would be able is your feedback on your experience with the ATS. How does it compare pros and cons with both systems .
Thanks
I've never used an algae scrubber.
But my ARID E18 reduced my PO4 levels from 0.08 to 0.00 in 11 days.
ARID E18 Phosphate Control.
I'm not disparaging algae scrubbers at all. I've just never used one.
I think a better question is which method is easier to use and maintain over the long haul.
Whichever one of those methods works best for you is the one you should use.
Not sure if you're being snarky or not as I posted this waaaaaay back on page one of this four page thread:
My set up is space limited and I dont have room for an ATS system. Hence my post that an ATS might win in his system, but not in mine and that every system is different.
My concern with the ATS is I was told they tend to discolour your water more so than a Chaeto based system.
In the two years running mine, on two different tanks, I have never encountered that. I can see that happening, if they are not maintained properly. What I mean by that, is don't let the HA get too thick, where the bottom layer starts dying off, leaching back into the water column. I clean mine as needed, whether weekly, or bi-weekly.
Remember
The size of your ATS is determined by how much you feed not the size of the tank.
Its been revised over the years based on lots of feed back and experimenting. It's also spelled out mainly for those wanting to build their own and not for those selling the products.I know the people who sell the ATSs say this, but I've always wondered what it's based on? Is there any way to objectively prove/measure this?
Mike