To me, easy went out the window with the word thumbscrews. My calcium reactor doesn't have thumbscrews since I despise them so much!
And no a fuge is not the fastest maintenance. Not having one at all is!
That being said I like the ARID but I think sometimes reefers become more focused on growing algae rather than focusing on their corals.
My question for you guys is this. If you did the same dosing of the tank that ARID suggests as well as the same amount of light as the ARID, will you get much improved results on a standard fuge or algae scrubber? I suspect that you will.
Greg, I hate thumbscrews too. Ever since I ran GFO in the first version of a TLF Phosban reactor.
These really are different, not a PITA at all.
Seriously.
I cant speak for anyone but me, and my experiances first hand. Like I state in the first post on the ARID thread, I had high PO4 levels, and doing frequent regular, massive water changes and using ALOT of GFO was only barely keeping them in check. I was also unable get meaningful results with a chaeto in a normal fuge.
I suspect that my magnesium levels may have been elevated to around 1500,(which will cause chaeto to go dormant), but I cant confirm since I wasnt keeping a journal at that time,(that was back in 2007/2008). I'm no longer dosing NO3 or iron supplements to system, just running the ARID. I even pulled my skimmer offline because the ARID was so effective at pulling PO4, that it was killing corals. I literally had 0.00 ppm of PO4 (as measured by Hanna 96713) for several months.
Skimmer was over sized for the system,(140 gallon system with SRO 5000 internal), and I just stopped dosing at the same time I pulled the skimmer out.
PO4 was just tested last week at 0.04 ppm ,(Hanna 96713), with NO3 tested at 5ppm via Salifert.
I dont know if dosing NO3 and iron & manganese will give better results to ATS users or Refugium users. Like you, I also suspect it would.
I'm a long time hobbyist like yourself and others, and have also come to realize there are many ways to accomplish one's "goals" in this hobby. Each way usually has some form of trade off, but if that's understood/planned for in advance, then it's can be worked around.
Personally, the ARID works great for me and my needs. It might not work as well for others,
OR
Others may be able to obtain similar results another way.
Whatever works best for you,(meaning anyone, not you specifically), is the method you should use. Again, just speaking generically, not to you specifically in this case.