uwish
Member
I am just going to put this here, a video of a presentation done not to long ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU&index=2&list=LLd9P3BK0ThwkcHLRRmpGxxg
I chose this particular lecture because he has found the very same anomalies in the government reports that I have found, and his plots from the source data look the same as mine (as they should, it's from the original data). Don't forget, in the late 70's and early 80's it was all the panic about global cooling and the new ice age. Funny how they shifted pretty quickly (relatively) speaking isn't it??
as a physicist, whether you believe in this climate issue or not, the complete and utter manipulation of the data is blatant and goes beyond unethical, because governments are making policy decisions based on, IMO junk science.
And for the record; yes the arctic ice is shrinking, but antarctic ice is growing alarmingly fast. Glaciers melting doesn't really impress me, they have been since the last ice age when they were deposited, nothing new there.
I won't get into the individual points that have been presented here on this forum, but I do ask you to LOOK at the data yourself, then ask yourself...why is it that only 'certain' data is used? I think it's because they are looking for confirmation bias, and they easily find it.
I could go on for hours, because I have pulled all the data, I have plotted it, and the conclusions being made are false, and it's a fraud. This is about taxation and wealth redistribution and has almost nothing to do with 'climate'.
And for Pete's sake, please STOP saying Climate Change, that is a tautology, climate is always changing by definition. There is allot of really shoddy stuff floating around out there, try to think and do some work yourself and don't just climb on the climate bandwagon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU&index=2&list=LLd9P3BK0ThwkcHLRRmpGxxg
I chose this particular lecture because he has found the very same anomalies in the government reports that I have found, and his plots from the source data look the same as mine (as they should, it's from the original data). Don't forget, in the late 70's and early 80's it was all the panic about global cooling and the new ice age. Funny how they shifted pretty quickly (relatively) speaking isn't it??
as a physicist, whether you believe in this climate issue or not, the complete and utter manipulation of the data is blatant and goes beyond unethical, because governments are making policy decisions based on, IMO junk science.
And for the record; yes the arctic ice is shrinking, but antarctic ice is growing alarmingly fast. Glaciers melting doesn't really impress me, they have been since the last ice age when they were deposited, nothing new there.
I won't get into the individual points that have been presented here on this forum, but I do ask you to LOOK at the data yourself, then ask yourself...why is it that only 'certain' data is used? I think it's because they are looking for confirmation bias, and they easily find it.
I could go on for hours, because I have pulled all the data, I have plotted it, and the conclusions being made are false, and it's a fraud. This is about taxation and wealth redistribution and has almost nothing to do with 'climate'.
And for Pete's sake, please STOP saying Climate Change, that is a tautology, climate is always changing by definition. There is allot of really shoddy stuff floating around out there, try to think and do some work yourself and don't just climb on the climate bandwagon.
Last edited: