Anyone Thinking of Dumping LEDS and going back to Halides

3 250w metal halides for 5yrs will cost $2560
3 170w g3 radion pros cost $3140 for 5yrs electric + leds,
It is more for the leds but you wont need a chiller.
this is just an estimate I did on the aquarium calculator.
 
Anyone Thinking of Dumping LEDS and going back to Halides

3 250w metal halides for 5yrs will cost $2560
3 170w g3 radion pros cost $3140 for 5yrs electric + leds,
It is more for the leds but you wont need a chiller.
this is just an estimate I did on the aquarium calculator.


I run 3 x 250w mh's and 8 x 54w t5's on my system and don't need a chiller. I also don't need a heater for that matter. Did you add the body of running a heater with your led costs??? But once again if i was concerned about saving $40 a month I'd get rid of my tank and become a coin collector.

I'm also curious about how you're calculating the energy costs.

What you're also missing is that saying 3 radions will give you the same coverage as 3 mh's is not accurate. I was told by ecotech that would need 6 radions to properly light my tank.
 
Last edited:
3 250w metal halides for 5yrs will cost $2560
3 170w g3 radion pros cost $3140 for 5yrs electric + leds,
It is more for the leds but you wont need a chiller.
this is just an estimate I did on the aquarium calculator.

I get the feeling that you do not understand this is not the thread to try and sell people on LEDs. This thread was started by people who went from traditional light sources to LEDs then back to traditional light sources. It was suggested earlier that you actually read the thread, so you will understand, especially since the title of the thread wasn't enough of a clue.

I think it is great that you are participating, but consider for a moment if this is the thread to try and convince people LEDs are better?
 
Cost savings might be a valid opinion, but my view of this thread is coloring up acros, not saving energy. I am mostly LED, I have no plans to run Halide, but I'm not going to make a cost argument.

1. I do not know the maintenance costs on my LED fixtures yet.

2. Replaceable bulb technology, be it T5 or Halide, has the advantage that the key part is easily replaceable, and a known cost.

3. I don't care about energy costs, but I am concerned about ambient heat. My LED fixtures heat up our basement, I can't imagine what Halide would do.

If my LED fixture pays for itself in 3 years and then needs $500 worth of replacement parts in year 4 then I really haven't saved any money, but I'm not out to save money otherwise I would not have a reef tank. :D

Original post that started this thread:

Hello all, I have a 125gal reef tank with 250W Radiums on it, a little frag tank with a 250W Ushio 20k and a 60 gal frag tank with an ecotech Radion on one side and a DIY Rapid LED set up on the other side. I can't help but notice the corals and the tank just looks better under the Halides. I have never tried the ATI power Module, and am half way thinking about replacing the LED's with the power module, but then I think maybe jsut put 2 more radiums on there instead. am I crazy for wanting to replace the LED's or have any of you noticed anything similar?
 
What you're also missing is that saying 3 radions will give you the same coverage as 3 mh's is not accurate. I was told by ecotech that would need 6 radions to properly light my tank.

Yup, I ran 4 radions and that was pushing it lengthwise. 5 or 6 would have been ideal for better coverage. Luckily my tank was narrow front to back.
Now I'm running three 250w mh.
 
Not that I want to prolong this but since the stock markets are ruining my day again today I needed a diversion for a few minutes. Here is my analysis that I made when making my decision on lighting. I compared buying (new not used) 3 x hamilton cozumel sun pendants, 3 x galaxay select a watt ballasts, 3 x 250w 20k radium bulbs, LET 8 x 54w t5 retro kit and 8 x 54w t5's to purchasing 6 (ecotechs suggestion for my tank) Radion Pro G3's. The hard part with calculating energy cost on LED's is the ramp up/down periods so to make all things equal I calculated both MH and LED at full power for 7 hrs, 4 x 54w t5's at 12 hrs and 4 x 54w t5's at 9 hrs. For my energy cost I looked at my electric bill and in SC we pay about .13 per kwh. I wanted to include the cost of my t5's because I dont see many tanks that just run mh without any other lighting. Im not including the need for a chiller on a mh tank or the argument that you will need a heater with leds and not mh.

mh comparison.JPG

Obviously everyones tanks, electrical costs, photo periods, bulb choices and any other variable that can play into this will be different. But you can see that even after 5 yrs LED's still cost me $1300 more than LED's. I spent $5k for a fancy led fixture on my last tank and struggled with sps loss after sps loss for a year. I truly believe it was an issue with the spectrum shifting from me playing around with the colors so much that damaged the tissue of the corals. Ultimately I sold it for $2k a year later. Even if my cost comparison came out different and LED's proved to be cheaper I still would have gone with MH's. I just wanted something that turns on and off and grows corals.
 
You guys are right, there are no good looking LED lit tanks.... http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1852268&page=24

Ill just leave that there..

It would seem you haven't read the thread either, or if you did, you failed to understand. There are plenty of gorgeous LED lit tanks, and most of us do not have our heads hurried in the sand. How would you explain the numerous people who have noticed better coloration after dumping their LEDs and going back to conventional lighting?
 
Hardly anybody uses LED panels that are 5 years old - some probably just want to upgrade, but it is still real for some reason. I am not saying that they will be worn out, only that they don't seem to stay on tanks that long. I think that a 3 year CBA is a better estimate of how long they might get used. Also, you will see significant savings in heater cost with the MH, if indeed you need heaters a lot - heating the tank is the biggest cost for me in Colorado.
 
I run 3 x 250w mh's and 8 x 54w t5's on my system and don't need a chiller. I also don't need a heater for that matter. Did you add the body of running a heater with your led costs??? But once again if i was concerned about saving $40 a month I'd get rid of my tank and become a coin collector.

I'm also curious about how you're calculating the energy costs.

What you're also missing is that saying 3 radions will give you the same coverage as 3 mh's is not accurate. I was told by ecotech that would need 6 radions to properly light my tank.

What are the dimensions of your tank?

Mine is a standard 210gal (6ftx2ftx29) and I figured 3 radions would be enough....? I'm sure it would still be underlite compared to my 3 250w mh but wouldn't 3 radions be enough? Not that I have any plans for radions lol.... (I'd go Hydra 52's before eco-junk myself)
 
Hardly anybody uses LED panels that are 5 years old - some probably just want to upgrade, but it is still real for some reason. I am not saying that they will be worn out, only that they don't seem to stay on tanks that long. I think that a 3 year CBA is a better estimate of how long they might get used. Also, you will see significant savings in heater cost with the MH, if indeed you need heaters a lot - heating the tank is the biggest cost for me in Colorado.
Word.

That's the real killer for leds is they cost a fortune upfront, then hardly anyone will stick with one kind longer than 3 or 4 years before "upgrading" to something else while taking a huge loss of that original led purchase....
 
What are the dimensions of your tank?

Mine is a standard 210gal (6ftx2ftx29) and I figured 3 radions would be enough....? I'm sure it would still be underlite compared to my 3 250w mh but wouldn't 3 radions be enough? Not that I have any plans for radions lol.... (I'd go Hydra 52's before eco-junk myself)

my tank is 8x3x2. I had hoped that 4 would do the job but Ecotech said it wouldnt be enough. they suggested that I start with 6 and that there would be a possibility of needing 8 if i got heavily into sps.
 
What are the dimensions of your tank?

Mine is a standard 210gal (6ftx2ftx29) and I figured 3 radions would be enough....? I'm sure it would still be underlite compared to my 3 250w mh but wouldn't 3 radions be enough? Not that I have any plans for radions lol.... (I'd go Hydra 52's before eco-junk myself)

4 minimum on a 6 footer.
I had 4 on my 7' tank and they were hanging lengthwise over the tank. Hanging front to back I would have needed 5-6.
 
your right I didn't read the entire thread just wanted to put my 2 cents in, I like halides and I like leds that I am currently running hard to compare them because they are two different animals.
 
your right I didn't read the entire thread just wanted to put my 2 cents in, I like halides and I like leds that I am currently running hard to compare them because they are two different animals.

It's daunting when you see a giant thread like this, the thought of going back to the beginning. But it's actually a pretty good read. Of course a lot of it is the same arguments that get beat to death, LOL. But in between the bickering there is some really good info, pics, links, etc. Definitely worth a read no matter which direction you take with your lighting.
 
It's daunting when you see a giant thread like this, the thought of going back to the beginning. But it's actually a pretty good read. Of course a lot of it is the same arguments that get beat to death, LOL. But in between the bickering there is some really good info, pics, links, etc. Definitely worth a read no matter which direction you take with your lighting.

And some Hijinks too :)
 
Back
Top