I had an extremely long response crafted but alas:
You indicated you were holding your own until you were told to take a step back... Umm no, really you were not.
It is impossible to debate a moving target - police officers hating HPS to some youtube guys opinion about import LEDs to a fully mis-interpreted white paper on phosphor technology to canned fake-study-press-release marketing to a grossly incorrect view of the lighting technology industry. You can't just string fun-factoids together and derive your own version of science, fact or reality.
The thing I really don't get is that you are overtly attempting to tell people who have TRIED and DID NOT LIKE LEDs (for whatever reason) that they are simply either too stupid to understand the error in their ways or the technology they tried to use or too biased to have a valid opinion.
I think you mean well and are attempting to carry on a conversation, but please understand that the rest of us pretty much see signature "fan boy" behavior and an inability to yield to fact, not enthusiasm and the willingness to participate in an educational conversation.
As you will note: I am an LED user and proponent for many reasons and applications. At the same time, I am a realist and can articulate what issues I have with the technology and/or articulate why. When the PFO Solaris hit the market, I was called a "hater" because I said:
- the spectral output REALLY sucked
- the fixture was a piece of crap
- the "as bright as a X Watt halide marketing was a lie
- the published efficiency numbers were hogwash
- just about all aspects of the marketing was BS
- Solaris was bestowed many magical traits that defied known physics
In fact, anybody who held ANY of those opinions was brutally attacked with nonsense from the "fan boys" (and early adopters that spent a fortune). Many a thread was closed and many a member (on both sides of the debates) was banned. We all now realize that the bullet points above were all 100% true.....
Not all of us are as ignorant as you appear to think.