For those of you thinking about dropping LED and going back to Halides - I suggest you read this white paper.
http://ecotechmarine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Ecotech_CoralLab_WP1.pdf
Congratulations, you have just been marketed to.
For those of you thinking about dropping LED and going back to Halides - I suggest you read this white paper.
http://ecotechmarine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Ecotech_CoralLab_WP1.pdf
Congratulations, you have just been marketed to.
Hi Aqualund!
Thx for your comments! I currently have no acro's in my tank to do a comparison with....all I know for sure is the stylo's in the center of the tank, that get light from both sources about equally, are growing towards the Kessil. I was also advised one should use PUR values (versus PAR) when measuring LED's true output, but PUR instruments are rarer and much more expensive... so those measurements are unlikely to be done by me.
"not receiving incidental light in the ranges (LEDs do not have) from the MH"....I'm curious, what ranges of the spectrum are the Kessils missing? They are fully adjustable from 10,000k up to 20,000k and I was told they produce very good UV (30%)... but I have no way to confirm that personally.
*edit* And this is not really an on-going test ..I was sort of forced into it when I dunked one of the Kessils (lots of VERY colorful language, followed by self-loathing and shame ) that was on the right hand side of my tank, so I pulled out my Current USA mH fixture, replaced the bulbs and mounted it in the drowned Kessil's place a few months ago. I plan to replace the mH when the summer months arrive (I had some heat problems before with the mH) with another Kessil, which runs considerably cooler.
Cheers, Tim
Well, do you have any other studies that state otherwise?
I dont know... I don't consider an Lfs putting many thousands dollars at risk "marketing".
Otherwise to what?
Many thousands of dollars on marketing is a tiny amount. That paper is pure marketing. At first I was excited to see it. Then when I realized the coral choices they made I was disappointed.
If they wanted to create a true scientific white paper they would have chosen a wide variety of corals. This was a targeted effort in order to show LEDs can grow coral better than other lights. What it did prove was that some select coral can grow better under LED in the conditions they created. We knew that already.
If you look at their Radion - MH trough they used 4 Radion fixtures against 2 250w MH fixtures.
That LEDs are not effective when growing corals?
Or that MH are a lot better than LEDs when growing corals?
If you look at their Radion - MH trough they used 4 Radion fixtures against 2 250w MH fixtures.
That's what I thought. Sorry, you may be in the wrong thread.
Actually no - I am looking at new lighting and am interested in the Radions - but if there is really proof that they don't work as well as MH - they I guess I might have to rethink.
But, from your answer, I am guessing there isn't?
Maybe because the Radion has a Max. Wattage of 170W - and they were not at maximum strength?
Maybe because the Radion has a Max. Wattage of 170W - and they were not at maximum strength?
But like any led fixture, they do not have a continuous range of wavelengths like a MH or T5, especially below 455nm. yes Im quite sure they have violet leds that go to 420nm maybe? But they don't have anything below that, and anything below 455nm from an led is a specific wavelength. (because there are no phosphors being used to make the color at this range)
The debate comes into play with coloring and growing Acroporas, and those that have attempted grwoth of these corals with Both MH and LED like to look at these wavelength gaps as glaring examples of the shortcomings of LEDs. Myself included.
Is it peer reviewed and proven? No.
But it is for these reasons that you cannot compare even full spectrum LEDs 1:1 with MH or T5.
Comforably,
But like any led fixture, they (Kessil) do not have a continuous range of wavelengths like a MH or T5, especially below 455nm. yes Im quite sure they have violet leds that go to 420nm maybe? But they don't have anything below that, and anything below 455nm from an led is a specific wavelength. (because there are no phosphors being used to make the color at this range)
Hi again Aqualand
Are you sure about that? I see conflicting testimony to yours, specifically:
"Kessil has huge peaks in the 400 range and something that really nobody else has, a peak in the UVA (mid-high 300s). The PUR of the kessils is ridiculous which is why they have such great outcomes with a relatively low par compared to some of the other LED manufacturers."
That post was backed up by slief, a sponser of the site: (near the bottom of the page)
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2573290
Its hard to know who to believe.
Hi again Aqualand
Are you sure about that? I see conflicting testimony to yours, specifically:
"Kessil has huge peaks in the 400 range and something that really nobody else has, a peak in the UVA (mid-high 300s). The PUR of the kessils is ridiculous which is why they have such great outcomes with a relatively low par compared to some of the other LED manufacturers."
That post was backed up by slief, a sponser of the site: (near the bottom of the page)
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2573290
Its hard to know who to believe.
Depends. If you aren't going to have an SPS Acro focused tank I think many here might agree LED will work fine.
If you are then you will want to at least double the fixture count to avoid shadowing of the acros, possible more depending on tank dimensions. Think of a stage with an actor and how they would appear with just one or two spotlights overhead.
I'm far far from an expert, just another newb that started with LED and then moved to T5 due to shadowing and growth issues with my acros.