anyone using a nano reefpack 200 yet?

I actually haven't turned it all the way in, at present it is exposed 3 threads and the foam is doing exactly what it should rising and falling, getting increasingly more dense. I just turned it in slowly to get a dryer foam
 
thanks roger tank looks great thanks for the skimmer pics hope we can get the skimmers working I want a reef pack for my new 30 trim less cube btw can we get any of the tunze lighting products?????
 
It isn't impossible but only 150w is available. We carried them briefly but they are just as expensive as Giesemann which has more color choices and is a gloss fixture while ours is a matte black. I no longer keep them in stock.
 
Roger-

Does the longer screw come in the/a Tunze mounting kit, or the box, etc? If it does, Marine Depot seems to think they have a Reefpack, I might be ordering it....

I don't mind tinkering, if I can get the parts... :)


-Andy
 
The screw is a temporary fix, what we need to do is replace the top deck of the units that are out. I am unsure if this is universal or only some are affected. It sounds like according to roshan some were fine out of the box.
 
Oh BTW, the screw is part of the standard mouning kit but the Nano Reefpack includes a mag holder so it wouldn't have the screw but I can send you one.
 
when you say top deck of skimmer what part is that??? also do you have any other pics of the skimmer disassembled???

cb
 
The part the cup sits on. It is a cap with a hole in it and the venturi adjustment. The venturi adjustment seems to not be properly machined. I could be wrong and maybe their is another solution but from what I am seeing the hole has to be moved over slightly and the fix will be to replace this part on existing units.
 
Roger - nice pics of the setup. I will hopefully be able to post you some pics of my skimmer setup tmrw. I was going to clean it out tonight but left it to show you the type of skimmate being produced.

Roger, I see that you have mounted the 2 nano components seperately with the brackets. I currently have mine attached with the magnet but was thinking of separating them too. I see that the nano filter is attached with the surface skimmer facing fwd but the unit is horizontal with it attached to the back glass. How have you done this as my unit appears to only be able to attached via the side grooves thus only allowing a side glass fixing if you want the surface skimmer facing out as you have.

I have found that due to quite high evaporation in my system I have to top up every couple of days otherwise the nano filter starts to pump out air. I was thinking of perhaps modding the unit by placing a small hole in the middle of unit and thus avoiding the unit pumping air in the event that I forget to top up in time. Do you think this would be ok and still allow the surface skimmer to function as it should ?

Thanks
Roshan

ps. Thanks to all who have helped on this thread - there are very few in the UK with this unit that are part of a forum community.
 
I just have the one, what you see next to it is the overflow 1077. It is on a standpipe that drains to my sump.
 
As for the hole. I have done this before on the larger Tunze filters and it does help but I would probably say a top off system would be the best solution.
 
Hi Roger - sorry for the delay in getting back....I've only just got my new dig cam so not very familar with it. Anyway, I drilled two holes in the nano filter box today - about halfway down which will now resolve my prob of pump taking in air if I forget to top up in time. I did a little test and it operates well.

I have taken two pictues of my nano skimmer in operation - I'm not sure how these will turn out - plse let me know. For info, I only have the air ajustment screw (blue) turned about half to one turn and its producing a really good foam in the chamber - I guess my internal setup is fine. I also had a look at the issue with regards the microbubbles. The bottom cover was pretty secure so this was not the problem - on inspection I could see two very small holes (1-2mm) either side of the release notch. This is where the bubbles are escaping from - I put a little filter wool inside which seems to have solved the prob 70% but still getting some mirco bubble release. I think I may try and put a little reef putty (milliput) over the holes to totally block. Do you think this is a good idea? or any other suggestions?

Let me know how the pics turn out and what you think of the skimmer operation / skimmate.

Thanks Roshan.:bum:

ps. Thanks for all the help Roger and everyone else on this thread - I may not be back on very often in the next couple of weeks as my wife and I are expecting our first baby any day now! (very exciting) - I will try and log on when I can.:rollface:

pss. sorry but could not upload pics - I need to resize them to 50k so will try to get them attached to my gallery tmrw..
 
I have mine running for 3-4 weeks. After tweeking with Rogers advise i hardly hear mine. I have no microbubble problems unless i forget to top off.




i love the surface skimming. keeping it looking clean.


 
Roger or anyone else, do you know if it's ok to use Phosban or Rowaphos in the media chamber unit?

Aaron
 
Yes, I think the best media to use in it would be Chemi Pure. It is easy to use and will help scavange any organics.
 
Roger - as promised here are the pics of my unit in operation. I have since put some seachem "sea-gel" into the filter chamber (this is a mix of carbon & phosphate remover) - its made a real difference to the water clarity. No real reason as to the choice chem media, just that it was on offer at the lfs over the w'end.

Roshan


111765nano1.JPG


111765nano2.JPG
 
Hey Roshan, looks like. I may give second though to using the media chamber now. I was considering trying out a Phosban reactor, but that sea-gel product seems like it'd be a good alternative. Do you just put that in a mesh bag inside?

Aaron
 
Back
Top