<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6702103#post6702103 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by vaporize
that does not explain why the misbarred one does not get collected from the wild.
Like say, there are 30% each batch get misbarred. There should be probability that they will get collected even if 1% survived.
First and foremost, they are collected from the wild. If you are under the impression that there are no WC mis barred clowns, you are mistaken.
So lets use your 30% rate... An A. ocellaris pair lays 1000 eggs, they all hatch in a CB tank. Of the 1000, 300 have mis barring and 700 do not. Of the 1000 that hatched 10% make it to saleable size. Assuming even distribution of death between misbarred and not misbarred, that leaves 30 misbarred and 70 normally barred fish. Now apply that same thinking to WC with 1% survival, you end up with 3 misbars and 7 normally barred.
Now lets assume that collectors, exporters and importers all have compsired to get the best fish possible to their customers and that part of being "best" is appearance, which includes fully barred fish. So a collector comes upon a group of fish, 30% are misbarred and 70% are normally barred, he is going to take from the 70% side and not the 30% side. And so on and so on.
Now lets get real here for a moment and get out of fansty land of thought expariments.
1) No one knows the rate at which clownfish produce misbarrs either in captivity or in the wild. While it maybe possible to determine the percentage on average of the number of misbarred clowns in a captive breeding program, it is impossible to calculate it in the wild. Even the calculation that could be done in the CB world would be misleading as... see #2.
2) There are things at play with misbarring at the genetic level that defies the conventional thinking on genetics and the passing on of traits.
3) The idea that there are more misbarred CB fish than WC fish is a wife's tale that is true and based on bad thinking/logic.
4) That misbarring has no effect on the fish what so ever. It is a mute point as far as the fish is concerned. The only that is at issue is the subjective attitudes of people that see the fish.