Tabeaubi
New member
Recently my calcium reactor has been unable to keep up with the calcium demand in my tank. I purchased a add on chamber and need some info regarding the monitoring of pH.
Here's the details.
Primary reactor is a MRC-1 running:
- Maxi jet 1200 feed pump
- MAg-2 REcirculation pump
- Pinpoint pH controller
- ARM & Shuran Media
- Secondary chamber is an MRC XL reactor chamber able to hangle 14lbs of material. There is a input and output only on this reactor.
The effluent is monitored with the pH controller to keep the pH within 6.75 - 6.89.
My reactors don't have the ability to mount the pH probe within them.
So, when I add this second chamber the ph will be higher than the effluent coming out of the first chamber.
What is the best way to make sure that I don't melt all the media in the first chamber?
Would monitoring the effluent of the pH out of the 1st chamber, getting a reading. Than hooking the 2nd chamber in-line and monitor the effluent coming out of it and figure out how much the pH rises after passing through it and adjust the controller accordingly. Seems a little sketchy to do it that way.
Any thoughts/ideas/brainstorming would be helpful.
Thanks,
Tom
Here's the details.
Primary reactor is a MRC-1 running:
- Maxi jet 1200 feed pump
- MAg-2 REcirculation pump
- Pinpoint pH controller
- ARM & Shuran Media
- Secondary chamber is an MRC XL reactor chamber able to hangle 14lbs of material. There is a input and output only on this reactor.
The effluent is monitored with the pH controller to keep the pH within 6.75 - 6.89.
My reactors don't have the ability to mount the pH probe within them.
So, when I add this second chamber the ph will be higher than the effluent coming out of the first chamber.
What is the best way to make sure that I don't melt all the media in the first chamber?
Would monitoring the effluent of the pH out of the 1st chamber, getting a reading. Than hooking the 2nd chamber in-line and monitor the effluent coming out of it and figure out how much the pH rises after passing through it and adjust the controller accordingly. Seems a little sketchy to do it that way.
Any thoughts/ideas/brainstorming would be helpful.
Thanks,
Tom