Coral Tank from Canada (1350gal Display Tank)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I cant agree more with this statement - in an aquarium we are often trying to mix different species in a closed system as opposed to the open ocean reefs

the truth is that in nature and i recently observed this diving in the red sea, the diversity is determined by environmental and dominance factors - If one did a video on a section of reef over 10 years one would be amazed at what corals thrive then perish and then thrive- while we seek to emulate nature we must also learn that reefs change all the time as they grow!

I'm not sure who to attribute this to but the single greatest generator of new species in the world is the coral reef. There are in fact greater documented finds of new species previously unknown in the worlds rain forests but those are species preexisting over the millennia that we have just recently discovered.

I believe it is the chaos of life on and around reef structures that gives rise to new conditions sponsoring new species development. Change is a fact of life on a reef and in some ways is as much an element to be recognized in the hobby as good nutrition, among other things. Accepting change as a fundamental building block of our marine ecosystems is a challenge to our search for best practices.

Replication and change are somewhat contradictions in terms when considered in targeting best practices and yet as noted here success is recognizing the impact of both on the balance we all aspire to in the hobby.

Peter
 
Peter, thanks for your detailed take on LED's

I realized after writing about the LEDs that I should give equal recognition to the folks at aqua-medic who provided an excellent Metal Halide / T5 solution that was completely silent, low profile and excellent lighting solution for the technology. As Mr. Wilson and I have commented recently, it is impossible to turn off the metal halides and not notice that something is missing. This may be only affecting the aesthetics but somehow I very much doubt it. Until we can experiment our way out of it our best practice will continue to be the blend of Aqua-Medic and Orphek technologies as our chosen best practice.

Peter
 
nineball said:
look waaaaay up
I'm not sure the American portion of the audience would get this particular reference ...

growingup4.jpg


Dave.M
 
Some close-up photos on how-to with an expert on hand would probably be appreciated by anyone new to raising mangroves. Just a thought

Query for Mr.Wilson regarding dipping corals: How would you treat a coral with Christmas Tree worms in it (supposing you wanted to retain the worms, of course)? Do you have any experience with these?

Thx,

Dave.M

Larger worms like spirobrachus (xmas tree) fair well to the dip/bath. The same is true of larger crabs and mantis shrimp. The big stuff needs to be removed physically. Killing acro crabs is a common side effect of oxidizer baths.
 
I'm not sure the American portion of the audience would get this particular reference ...
Dave.M

Dave - Those of us close enough to the border to get CBC (channel 9 loooong before cable) certainly do ;)

Peter, a school of Idols? - You Sir, have likely never possessed a small idea. :thumbsup:
 
Quantum Sensors

Quantum Sensors

Every time I searched for something on RC, this thread came up at or near the top of the results, so I finally read it all. Great information, especially for a newcomer like me - thanks for sharing.

I noticed a post recently about using quantum sensors, so I thought you might be interested in the following response I received from Apogee regarding their current unit and LED applications.

"Apogee quantum sensors underweight blue light, and as a result, photon flux measurements for blue LEDs will be too low. Also, the quantum sensors overweight red light up to a wavelength of approximately 650 nm, above which they do not measure, and as a result, photon flux measurement for red LEDs will either be too high (if the LED output is all below 650 nm) or too low (if a non-negligible fraction of the LED output is above 650 nm). Our quantum sensors will likely provide a reasonable measurement for white LEDs because they are broadband, and because the sensors are calibrated under CWF lamps. However, because of the diversity of LED lighting systems the precise errors have not been quantified. The current spectral response of our quantum sensor can be viewed on our website (http://www.apogeeinstruments.com/quantum/spectralresponse.html). We are currently working on better filtering in order to achieve a sharp cutoff at both the 400 and 700 nm wavelengths, but this improvement is still a few months away.

That being said, Apogee quantum sensors can be used to measure the relative output of an LED or bank of LEDs, in order to track variability in output with time or temperature for example. However, quantum sensors should not be used to characterize the absolute output of LEDs (except for the possibility of white LEDs), to compare one LED to another, or to determine photon flux for plant growth for example."
 
Every time I searched for something on RC, this thread came up at or near the top of the results, so I finally read it all. Great information, especially for a newcomer like me - thanks for sharing.

I noticed a post recently about using quantum sensors, so I thought you might be interested in the following response I received from Apogee regarding their current unit and LED applications.

"Apogee quantum sensors underweight blue light, and as a result, photon flux measurements for blue LEDs will be too low. Also, the quantum sensors overweight red light up to a wavelength of approximately 650 nm, above which they do not measure, and as a result, photon flux measurement for red LEDs will either be too high (if the LED output is all below 650 nm) or too low (if a non-negligible fraction of the LED output is above 650 nm). Our quantum sensors will likely provide a reasonable measurement for white LEDs because they are broadband, and because the sensors are calibrated under CWF lamps. However, because of the diversity of LED lighting systems the precise errors have not been quantified. The current spectral response of our quantum sensor can be viewed on our website (http://www.apogeeinstruments.com/quantum/spectralresponse.html). We are currently working on better filtering in order to achieve a sharp cutoff at both the 400 and 700 nm wavelengths, but this improvement is still a few months away.

That being said, Apogee quantum sensors can be used to measure the relative output of an LED or bank of LEDs, in order to track variability in output with time or temperature for example. However, quantum sensors should not be used to characterize the absolute output of LEDs (except for the possibility of white LEDs), to compare one LED to another, or to determine photon flux for plant growth for example."

Thank you very much. This is very helpful, especially coming from the company. Honesty like this is most welcome and respected. I agree that one very helpful attribute is to measure relative changes in bulb strength over time. I suspect too many of us don't and fail to properly diagnose changes in coral health and behaviour as a result.

I will certainly be watching for the next release of the Apogee product as they appear to be honing in on our focus of interest.

Thanks again for taking the time to provide this info to the group. This dynamic is, in my opinion, what makes this culture so positive and the quality of info so high.

Peter
 
Nick, thank you very much for your generous remarks. You are right in acknowledging this thread community as a significant element in this build. Just about every element of this process has been touched or improved by and through feedback coming from this group. I fact I would suggest that a best practice for this hobby is the effort to involve members of this forum in a significant build of this nature. I still have a significant way to go down this road and I plan to continue to share and seek advice with the enormous benefit of having the long term followers of this thread in tow.

As far as the Four Grand Masters and 'Mother Nature' are concerned.........I will be naming the Second Grand Master soon. I think we can all be proud of the selection of the First Grand Master Chingchai. There was not ONE dissenting vote leading up to the selection and not one reservation by members of this community that he represented the best in all of us for the results he has achieved. My patient goal for the subsequent awards is to achieve the same level of respect and credibility.

Mother Nature by the way couldn't produce what Chingchai has assembled in one thousand gallon cube of ocean reef. Only an undersea gardener with the competence and dedication that Chingchai has applied in his effort to try and take the best that mother nature supplies and put it in close proximity in one tank. He has raised the bar for this hobby and in turn made it even more difficult to identify who the other three peers should be......... soon, real soon.

Oh and before I forget, welcome to our community and welcome to the reef central forum.

Peter

Peter,
I want to thank you for your warm welcome and possibly clarify my statements about the four grand masters and "mother nature".

I had my first saltwater aquarium over fourty years ago ( no such thing as a "reef tank " back then. Being fotunate enough growing up in close proximity to the Florida keys I collected all my own fish and corals. The corals where mainly for the purpose of feeding anglefish and other " picky" feeders, nothing elaborate, the flats where coverd with rose and finger coral back then. If for whatever reason I lost a fish , which didn't happen very often , it just tore me up inside because I always had that lingering image of seeing it swimming around happy and beautiful in it's natural enviornment and I always questioned myself if I had the right to take them from their home.

We often speek about this endeavor " reefkeeping " as a hobby and the animals we place in them as " pets" .My comments about " mother nature " was just me speeking with my " heart " so that we should never lose sight of the fact that we are dealing with often very rare and " wild" animals who are taken away from their natural envirnment and being displayed in a very unnatural environments however beautiful that may be.

I certainly ment no disrespect to you , your masters plan or especially to Chingchai , who I greatly admire and is most worthy of any accolades that are bestowed on him. If my words were interpeted that way, I apologize . I'm not good with words and that fact that I can converse with someone of your stature is both humbling and amazing to me. If we had the internet fourty years ago, I may have been able to keep those corals alive a little longer!

I'm off to finish Chingchai's thread .
Nick
 
Just finished reading 276 pages of your TJ. It is absolutely a work of art. gives you a good feeling when there is such a wide community in our chosen hobby. I am only a small fry in this game I have FOWLR tank for the last 3 years, my tank is 200Gal. I also read ChingChai's TJ and my jaw nearly dropped to the floor. I am jsut about build another tank 200Gal, hopefully I can successfully introduce some LPS and SPS.
Congratulation for a fantastic tank.
PS I was admiring your concealed ceiling lighting and the lighting under the tank. Are those Flexible SMD RGB LED strips lights??? If not would you be able to point me in the right direction to get some info on the lightings. I am interested in doing the same to my dining room ceiling.
 
Every time I searched for something on RC, this thread came up at or near the top of the results, so I finally read it all. Great information, especially for a newcomer like me - thanks for sharing.

I noticed a post recently about using quantum sensors, so I thought you might be interested in the following response I received from Apogee regarding their current unit and LED applications.

"Apogee quantum sensors underweight blue light, and as a result, photon flux measurements for blue LEDs will be too low. Also, the quantum sensors overweight red light up to a wavelength of approximately 650 nm, above which they do not measure, and as a result, photon flux measurement for red LEDs will either be too high (if the LED output is all below 650 nm) or too low (if a non-negligible fraction of the LED output is above 650 nm). Our quantum sensors will likely provide a reasonable measurement for white LEDs because they are broadband, and because the sensors are calibrated under CWF lamps. However, because of the diversity of LED lighting systems the precise errors have not been quantified. The current spectral response of our quantum sensor can be viewed on our website (http://www.apogeeinstruments.com/quantum/spectralresponse.html). We are currently working on better filtering in order to achieve a sharp cutoff at both the 400 and 700 nm wavelengths, but this improvement is still a few months away.

That being said, Apogee quantum sensors can be used to measure the relative output of an LED or bank of LEDs, in order to track variability in output with time or temperature for example. However, quantum sensors should not be used to characterize the absolute output of LEDs (except for the possibility of white LEDs), to compare one LED to another, or to determine photon flux for plant growth for example."


Thanks for posting the information, I was not aware of that. Quantum meters and LUX meters have their limitations, but they at least offer a yardstick and comparative number when comparing similar lights or experimenting with optical lenses. The Orphek LED lights we are using are 40% blue and are a special order, as they come standard as 30% blue. The Orphek white LED is 16,000K with a relatively low amount of light in the higher nanometer red spectrum so we can safely assume that our quantum meter readings are conservative.
 
I do not have a short list yet of fish or corals but I can tell you that I hope to add a school of moorish idols if I can find a healthy group to choose from. I have not found that I am attracted to either fish or corals because the are rare or expensive. I am fascinated with various Gorgonians and get an enormous boost of satisfaction in being able to host them in my main display tank with all the other mix of life on the reef.

Peter

Peter. You are so unique.
I salute you. Really.
 
Great thread guys, definately not a quick read... but an hour a day for a couple weeks and i am through it. Thank you nineball for sharing this journey with us all. Tank came out beautifully and seems to improve with every post... congratulations... and thanks for all the great info and great attitudes that made this thread a pleasure to read.

Nick
 
Peter - Moorish Idols only do well in huge public aquariums in groups , it is possible to keep a single healthy eating specimens for sometime in an aquarium like yours but i would not recommend a group to any aquarium under 5000 gallons.
 
Peter - Moorish Idols only do well in huge public aquariums in groups , it is possible to keep a single healthy eating specimens for sometime in an aquarium like yours but i would not recommend a group to any aquarium under 5000 gallons.

That may be true but Peter and his "A" team are trying for "best" practices and he might be able to pull it off...that I believe is in part what he is trying to do instead of doing what others say can't or shouldn't be done. :)

Mr. Wilson - Do you have any experiences with Moorish Idols kept successfully in home tanks?
 
Great thread guys, definately not a quick read... but an hour a day for a couple weeks and i am through it. Thank you nineball for sharing this journey with us all. Tank came out beautifully and seems to improve with every post... congratulations... and thanks for all the great info and great attitudes that made this thread a pleasure to read.

Nick

Thank you Nick and welcome to our group. To have read this thread has become a badge of honour for some and as such makes you a welcome addition by many on this thread.

Peter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top