<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14091704#post14091704 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by tmz
Steve 926, From what I've read in the thread the midwest variety of media seems to work very well and seed quickly.It may indeed be better. It is certainly more expensive and may be worth it.
The reactor design outlined in this thread by dj is excellent and relatively inexpensive and easy to build.
In the interest of accuracy and before I trash my LSM,however, I note that the problems with the LSM that I recall reading throughout the thread included:a case where the media was washed down with freshwater first and then cycling time became an issue and another where spit pea type media designed for a vaporizer was used . I just didn't see a post directly related to LSM not working.
Thanks for the reply Tom.
I referred to the problems posted by some, but not all, of the user's of the LSM media. you may find some of them in the original start of this thread, before the split. There are other threads on sulpher denitrators, of a different design, posting some similar results with the LSM, as I have mentioned.
The LSM media will work just fine in the reactor. however the post's on the Midwest media, appeared to have better results in the initial stages, & presented no problems with channeling or restrictions, due to media fines.
It's all good, whichever media you may use, as long as you can achieve the end results of low No3, with little to no problem's.
I must admit that I was eventually swayed to the Midwest media, when I noticed several of the commercial unit$ using it.
Yes it was a bit more $$, but I am satisfied with the results, & it is re usable.
It's not the first thing I've paid more $$ for in this expensive hobby:lol:
But it is one of the one's, that worked well.
Good reefing to you, & may your fish & corals smile
![Big grin :D :D](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png)
at you when you look in.
Steve
:smokin: