Looking at my system now, It appears you can use the safety connector without a tunze controller. I don't know if there's any complications with having your pump controlled by the apex. I just chose to run my 6095 seperate from the apex in the event of a power failure, the apex will have no effect on it. I will try plugging my safety connector into one of my 6095s controlled by the apex and see if it keeps running after I unplug the controller.
Would appreciate knowing the result of your test...
I'm in the midst of my 150gal build, and have already purchased a UPS for my APEX that will deal with any power blips and notify me if one of the dual circuits running my tank clicks off or should the power go completely out (tank pumps/dual-heaters/other-devices are split across the circuits, and home router is also on it's own UPS in my office). My plan is for 2 of my 6105s to be on an EB4 powered through that same UPS and controlled by the APEX (not something like a 7095), which sizing-wise should give me about 90 minutes with those two powerheads going full-bore. I will program the APEX to throttle down the two 6105s if the power goes out to maintain flow but reduce UPS battery drain keeping the powerheads running just a little longer.
As a backup-to-the-backup, I purchased a 6105.500 safety connector for those same two 6105 powerheads that will connect to a standalone battery sort of like your setup, so if there is a longer duration outage, prioritizing tank inhabitants first, I'll have another day or two of in-tank-flow with the 6105s running on "autopilot"
(whatever speed that ends up being -- I'm not sure) via each of their 6105.500 -- even if my APEX has no power, as wouldn't anything else supporting the tank until power comes back on. In theory, I'd have been notified by the APEX of the outage, and I'd have more than enough time to get home to deal with it myself, or get a family member over to my place to remove the hood and drop my multiple D-cell battery pumps and airstones in if it came to that...
I didn't see anything in the (sometimes hard to understand) Tunze documentation saying the 6105.500 required a controller, so hopefully not... Now I'm a bit worried on this design, but will adapt as required based on what you find -- THANKS in advance for reporting back.