Finally, a surge tank without the noise, bubbles, space, or plumbing!

LobsterOfJustice

Recovering Detritophobe
I've never heard anything bad about the flow surge tanks produce. Everyone who has had the ability to set one up always says they love the flow from it, but when people no longer have them it's always because they made too much noise, or too many bubbles, or took up too much space, or didn't work with the new setup. Most people never even consider setting one up because of the complicated plumbing and space they require. But there's just something about introducing a rush of new water that really gets all the water in the tank moving, more than just pushing the same water in the tank around. I've wanted a surge tank since I first heard about them. I've never had the space to set up a surge tank above the display, so I've just been waiting for the day I had an in-wall tank and could finally set one up. Now that I finally have an in-wall tank, it looks like I don't even need the extra space anyway thanks to my genius development of an entirely new surge system.:p You've heard of the Carlson Surge, the Borneman Surge and now for the unveiling of the Lobster Surge...

An oversized DC return pump connected to an aquarium controller.:idea::hammer:

Say what? If you think about it, the effect is the same. What you are looking for is a sudden rush of water being added to the tank in a short time frame, repeating every so often. My specific situation uses a Jebao 12000, plumbed with 1.5" pipe to get the maximum rated ~3170 gph out of it. It is controlled by an apex, which runs the pump at 60% power most of the time. However, every couple of minutes the apex ramps the return pump up to 100% for 30-45 seconds, resulting in a huge rush of water into the tank and creating awesome flow that you just can't get from powerheads.

I wanted to post about this because every time I hear DC pumps mentioned, someone asks something like "yeah, but how often do you want to change the speed of your return pump?" My answer is, every few minutes! It's like a lot of people don't even view their return pump as a tool for adding more flow to the tank, they just think its part of the filtration or something. Make that return pump useful! If you're scared to run a high flow rate through the sump all the time (which I'm not, but that's a discussion for another thread), consider using it in a surge scenario like I described. I think most people would find they need a lot less pumps (including powerheads) if they use the ones they have more efficiently. I have my return/surge on a seaswirl to make it even more useful by covering even more area in the tank.

People invariably question the water level in the sump and how this works with an ATO. First, I should point out that a surging DC pump actually messes with the water level in the sump less than a surge tank, because the sump water level is only affected during the 30-45 seconds that the surge is active. That said, there are two main ways to deal with this. The first is to set your ATO to the lowest level that the sump will reach, i.e. the level when the surge is active. The second way, which I use, is to add your ATO in a dosing type regime (i.e. activate for 14s every 30m) with the float switch used as an OFF override. This method has the added benefit of being a much safer way to perform ATO overall when compared to a system that is float-activated.

So there you have it. The effect of a surge tank without the surge tank. No bubbles, no noise. Unlike a traditional surge tank, you can easily fine tune the amount of flow produced, and the timing of the surge. For better or for worse, I really think this concept can kill the traditional surge tank (not that they ever really caught on anyway), except in the largest-scale cases where such high-flow DC pumps aren't available. Personally, I am LOVING this setup on my tank and I think other people could benefit from it too. The flow provided from a surge setup is literally unable to be replicated by any other means, and now you don't need a surge tank to get it. I haven't seen anyone else talking about this or putting this in to action, but now that cheap DC pumps are readily available, I'd love to see more people realize the awesome flow that a setup like this can provide.
 
I've never heard anything bad about the flow surge tanks produce. Everyone who has had the ability to set one up always says they love the flow from it, but when people no longer have them it's always because they made too much noise, or too many bubbles, or took up too much space, or didn't work with the new setup. Most people never even consider setting one up because of the complicated plumbing and space they require. But there's just something about introducing a rush of new water that really gets all the water in the tank moving, more than just pushing the same water in the tank around. I've wanted a surge tank since I first heard about them. I've never had the space to set up a surge tank above the display, so I've just been waiting for the day I had an in-wall tank and could finally set one up. Now that I finally have an in-wall tank, it looks like I don't even need the extra space anyway thanks to my genius development of an entirely new surge system.:p You've heard of the Carlson Surge, the Borneman Surge and now for the unveiling of the Lobster Surge...

An oversized DC return pump connected to an aquarium controller.:idea::hammer:

Say what? If you think about it, the effect is the same. What you are looking for is a sudden rush of water being added to the tank in a short time frame, repeating every so often. My specific situation uses a Jebao 12000, plumbed with 1.5" pipe to get the maximum rated ~3170 gph out of it. It is controlled by an apex, which runs the pump at 60% power most of the time. However, every couple of minutes the apex ramps the return pump up to 100% for 30-45 seconds, resulting in a huge rush of water into the tank and creating awesome flow that you just can't get from powerheads.

I wanted to post about this because every time I hear DC pumps mentioned, someone asks something like "yeah, but how often do you want to change the speed of your return pump?" My answer is, every few minutes! It's like a lot of people don't even view their return pump as a tool for adding more flow to the tank, they just think its part of the filtration or something. Make that return pump useful! If you're scared to run a high flow rate through the sump all the time (which I'm not, but that's a discussion for another thread), consider using it in a surge scenario like I described. I think most people would find they need a lot less pumps (including powerheads) if they use the ones they have more efficiently. I have my return/surge on a seaswirl to make it even more useful by covering even more area in the tank.

People invariably question the water level in the sump and how this works with an ATO. First, I should point out that a surging DC pump actually messes with the water level in the sump less than a surge tank, because the sump water level is only affected during the 30-45 seconds that the surge is active. That said, there are two main ways to deal with this. The first is to set your ATO to the lowest level that the sump will reach, i.e. the level when the surge is active. The second way, which I use, is to add your ATO in a dosing type regime (i.e. activate for 14s every 30m) with the float switch used as an OFF override. This method has the added benefit of being a much safer way to perform ATO overall when compared to a system that is float-activated.

So there you have it. The effect of a surge tank without the surge tank. No bubbles, no noise. Unlike a traditional surge tank, you can easily fine tune the amount of flow produced, and the timing of the surge. For better or for worse, I really think this concept can kill the traditional surge tank (not that they ever really caught on anyway), except in the largest-scale cases where such high-flow DC pumps aren't available. Personally, I am LOVING this setup on my tank and I think other people could benefit from it too. The flow provided from a surge setup is literally unable to be replicated by any other means, and now you don't need a surge tank to get it. I haven't seen anyone else talking about this or putting this in to action, but now that cheap DC pumps are readily available, I'd love to see more people realize the awesome flow that a setup like this can provide.

The problem with this concept on a return pump comes into play for those of us that use internal skimmers along with ATO's. The changing of the flow with the return pump will raise and lower the sump level. Doing so causes issues with skimmer consistency as well as ATO's. It's my experience that you are far better off keeping the return pump at a constant rate so the sump levels are consistent. Then use either a closed loop setup for the surge or some controllable power heads like Tunze's, Vortech's etc. I've been doing this with Tunze's in my display for many years now and the surge I get is terrific and I have complete control over them via my Apex. Not only do I use them to generate surges but I also have profiles created to stir up detritus.

This is also something else to consider with the return pump approach. Typically return lines are situated very close to the surface. Using a return pump as a surge device won't necessarily generate a surge across the entire height of the display but instead will likely generate the surge in the upper level of the water column.
 
For the ATO issue...Lengthen the delay of your ATO. To something like 60 seconds.
So it won't start to fill unless the water level is low for more than 60 seconds.
Mine is currently set to 10 seconds.
 
For the ATO issue...Lengthen the delay of your ATO. To something like 60 seconds.
So it won't start to fill unless the water level is low for more than 60 seconds.
Mine is currently set to 10 seconds.

Problem with that is that a continual surge will result in the switch being activated and deactivated which can be dealt with as you suggested. Like you, I have my ATO setup such that the switch needs to be activated for a while. Mine is set so that the ATO switch needs to be activated for 60 seconds before my ATO pump will be triggered.

If the return pump is ramping high enough, this could generate a fairly significant difference in sump level swings. If the ATO switch is set to the low point in the sump when the pump is at it's highest velocity, the end result could be that the ATO may not activate until the high point in the sump drops down below the low point when the pump is at maximum velocity. This could be a pretty significant amount of evaporation. If the ATO float switch is set to the high point in the sump which would probably be the best solution, the ATO may shut off late if the water level goal is achieved while the sump is at it's lowest level. If you are using a slow peristaltic pump for ATO duties, then it may not be a big deal but if you are using a higher velocity pump for ATO, you could end up adding more water than you want in there.

Even with potential work arounds for this, I am not a fan of this idea for reasons I already stated. There are ways to accomplish the same kind of surge with equal if not better results that allow for even more flow control.
 
For the ATO issue...Lengthen the delay of your ATO. To something like 60 seconds.
So it won't start to fill unless the water level is low for more than 60 seconds.
Mine is currently set to 10 seconds.

Sorry for high jacking the thread. I have Tunze Osmolater connected to Apex. How can I lengthen the delay as you mentioned?
 
Sorry for high jacking the thread. I have Tunze Osmolater connected to Apex. How can I lengthen the delay as you mentioned?

I don't believe you can with the Tunze. You would need to use a controller driven ATO such as an Apex or Profilux to be able to implement that level of control.
 
Guess I was thinking this was a closed loop setup with water being drawn from within the display and expelled in the display. I would think it would work in this instance but not directly from the sump with a return pump.
 
Guess I was thinking this was a closed loop setup with water being drawn from within the display and expelled in the display. I would think it would work in this instance but not directly from the sump with a return pump.


No! That's exactly the point I'm trying to make! It WILL work from the sump with a return pump, and it will work better than it would as a closed loop or power head in the display.
 
it will work better than it would as a closed loop or power head in the display.
You are mistaken there. I've run a real surge setup before and I can tell you from first hand experience that I get by far better surges with my 3 Tunze's on my 480g display than I did with a proper surge device let alone a variable speed return pump which I know plenty about since I am now running a pair of RD3 230 pumps on my tank. Those pumps are capable of pushing up to 5400gph+ and ramp up from 0 to full power in less than 8 seconds. There is no way you can create a better surge than a properly setup variable speed power head configuration as the current DC style pumps don't ramp up and down fast enough to compare to a good set of power heads. Power heads like the Tunze's and Vortech's can ramp from 0 to full power in milliseconds and when the timing is correct for the display, the surge you can create is far better than a surge based on a slow ramping return pump. Unless you have a really small tank, there is no way that you can create anywhere near as good of a surge with ANY DC pump short of a power head. If you think otherwise, that's fine by me.. I won't debate it any further. Plus as I mentioned before, your surge idea will primarily impact the upper level of the tank where the overflow draws from and where the returns are positioned.
 
I see we are just going to have to agree to disagree.

The benefit of running a surge type setup, is it doesnt matter where the water is being introduced. What you end up with is a rush of water from everywhere else in the tank towards the drains/overflows. You dont get that when you are running a powerhead or closed loop where you are just moving the same volume of water from one place to another. I'm not advocating ditching the powerheads - I have an MP40 also. It's more than an "idea" - I am using this method on a 6' tank and the surge provides flow throughout the tank, at the top and bottom, on the side where the return is positioned and 6' away on the other side of the tank.

You are mistaken there. I've run a real surge setup before and I can tell you from first hand experience that I get by far better surges with my 3 Tunze's on my 480g display than I did with a proper surge device let alone a variable speed return pump which I know plenty about since I am now running a pair of RD3 230 pumps on my tank. Those pumps are capable of pushing up to 5400gph+ and ramp up from 0 to full power in less than 8 seconds. There is no way you can create a better surge than a properly setup variable speed power head configuration as the current DC style pumps don't ramp up and down fast enough to compare to a good set of power heads. Power heads like the Tunze's and Vortech's can ramp from 0 to full power in milliseconds and when the timing is correct for the display, the surge you can create is far better than a surge based on a slow ramping return pump. Unless you have a really small tank, there is no way that you can create anywhere near as good of a surge with ANY DC pump short of a power head. If you think otherwise, that's fine by me.. I won't debate it any further. Plus as I mentioned before, your surge idea will primarily impact the upper level of the tank where the overflow draws from and where the returns are positioned.
 
The problem with this concept on a return pump comes into play for those of us that use internal skimmers along with ATO's. The changing of the flow with the return pump will raise and lower the sump level. Doing so causes issues with skimmer consistency as well as ATO's. It's my experience that you are far better off keeping the return pump at a constant rate so the sump levels are consistent. Then use either a closed loop setup for the surge or some controllable power heads like Tunze's, Vortech's etc. I've been doing this with Tunze's in my display for many years now and the surge I get is terrific and I have complete control over them via my Apex. Not only do I use them to generate surges but I also have profiles created to stir up detritus.

This is also something else to consider with the return pump approach. Typically return lines are situated very close to the surface. Using a return pump as a surge device won't necessarily generate a surge across the entire height of the display but instead will likely generate the surge in the upper level of the water column.

I have not seen enough change in the skimmer portion of my sump to affect my skimming performance.
 
Problem with that is that a continual surge will result in the switch being activated and deactivated which can be dealt with as you suggested. Like you, I have my ATO setup such that the switch needs to be activated for a while. Mine is set so that the ATO switch needs to be activated for 60 seconds before my ATO pump will be triggered.

If the return pump is ramping high enough, this could generate a fairly significant difference in sump level swings. If the ATO switch is set to the low point in the sump when the pump is at it's highest velocity, the end result could be that the ATO may not activate until the high point in the sump drops down below the low point when the pump is at maximum velocity. This could be a pretty significant amount of evaporation. If the ATO float switch is set to the high point in the sump which would probably be the best solution, the ATO may shut off late if the water level goal is achieved while the sump is at it's lowest level. If you are using a slow peristaltic pump for ATO duties, then it may not be a big deal but if you are using a higher velocity pump for ATO, you could end up adding more water than you want in there.

Even with potential work arounds for this, I am not a fan of this idea for reasons I already stated. There are ways to accomplish the same kind of surge with equal if not better results that allow for even more flow control.

I'm not sure you are understanding the ATO workaround - if you set the ATO switch to the lowest level your sump will reach during operation, it will work the same as with any other setup. You arent waiting for a significant amount of evaporation. As soon as any amount of evaporation occurs, during the next surge cycle the ATO will turn on and maintain the minimum level. Setting at the high point would only work on a dosing-based ATO setup like I explained (which is triggered to shut off by the float switch, not activate).
 
I'm not sure you are understanding the ATO workaround - if you set the ATO switch to the lowest level your sump will reach during operation, it will work the same as with any other setup.

That's exactly right. Ran a large reef tank years ago with a pair of dump buckets, and ATO worked just fine as long as you set it to trigger based on the lowest 'normal' level in the sump. No need to muck around with delays.

Yeah, dump buckets are messy, but the main reason I got rid of them is because the inconsistent amount of drain water made getting silent overflows impossible. Seems that 'pulsing' the return pump would create the same problem; have you a work around for this?
 
I'm not sure you are understanding the ATO workaround - if you set the ATO switch to the lowest level your sump will reach during operation, it will work the same as with any other setup. You arent waiting for a significant amount of evaporation. As soon as any amount of evaporation occurs, during the next surge cycle the ATO will turn on and maintain the minimum level. Setting at the high point would only work on a dosing-based ATO setup like I explained (which is triggered to shut off by the float switch, not activate).

Quite the contrary, I understand the ATO workaround quite well. In fact, it's not even a workaround as I use this same delay scenario with my ATO programming. It would really boil down to the surge interval and how long the delay is. If the surge interval is longer than the delay, then it would work fine. If the surge interval is really short and more importantly, shorter than the desired delay, it won't work as well as it would having a constant sump level. I prefer a long delay as it insures the ATO is not turning on due to slight variences in sump levels or bouncing of the float due to any turbulence in the sump.

I understand completely your concept and I am sure it would work but if you saw the flow I have in my tank and more importantly the surge I can generate via the use of my Tunze's coupled with my closed loop RD3 230 pump, I'd bet you would understand my point. There isn't a snowballs chance in hell that any variable speed return pump could match the level of surge in my tank. Now if you want to measure the surge in the sump, that would be a different story.

As I also said, in a smaller tank, the results may be slightly different but I also stand by what I said in that with proper programming, you can create amazing surges with the use of pumps like Vortechs and Tunzes, but placement of the pumps and of course the number of them in conjunction with their programming is critical to their impact. In my case, I have two big Tunze's, both of which are on one end of the tank facing down the 8' length. They are both situated in the middle of the water column. The 3rd Tunze is situated on my center overflow blowing the same direction as the other Tunzes. That 3rd Tunze has very little impact on the surge. I spent days trying to figure out the best on/off timing for the pumps for my setup. My on/off intervals are timed such that the surge hits the end of the tank 8' away before the pumps kick back on. The resulting surge can be pretty violent if I want it and cause a 1" swell that travels the length of the 8' tank and back. The resulting surge also covers the water column from top to bottom of my 4' wide x 8' long by 24" tall tank. There is no way I could ever accomplish the same surge using a return pump in large part because they don't ramp fast enough and also because my returns are situated within 1" of the waters surface. Even with my previous Hammerhead Gold and the pump being shut off, turning that pump on wouldn't generate a surge comparable to that of my two Tunze 6205's on the back 4' wall. It would be physically impossible because there isn't a single DC return pump out there that could match the flow of a pair of 6205's let alone the ability to strategically postition them for maximum impact the way you can pumps like Tunze's and Vortechs. I supposed I could mention Jebao's here too but I'm not a fan of them and their 5v control doesn't offer the kind of fine control that 10v does when it comes to Apex control.
 
Last edited:
For the ATO issue...Lengthen the delay of your ATO. To something like 60 seconds.
So it won't start to fill unless the water level is low for more than 60 seconds.
Mine is currently set to 10 seconds.

I'm installing a Carlson surge on an upcoming system. To alleviate ATO issues I plan on only running the surge during the day, while the ATO will operate at night. My surge reservoirs will drain back to the sump when powered off, so at night the ATO won't overfill the system.
 
There are no 'ATO issues' when using a surge device if you set it up correctly. Just figure out what the normal sump level is when the surge device is full and set the float/pressure/optical switch to trigger slightly lower than that. Easy, and works just fine. When the surge device discharges, the level in the sump will rise, but that has no effect on the ATO switch.

Surge devices can cause other issues such as noisy drains, not enough sump volume, etc.
 
Back
Top