Floridiot
Member
The switch has been made! I'm now running a 400W XM 10K lamp on a PFO HQI ballast. :smokin: According to Sanjay's charts, this lamp puts out 2.3 times the light as my 175 Iwasaki was. I'd have to say that by looking at it with human eyes, it seems more like 4 times as bright. The XM10K/HQI combo makes a very white looking light with a slight aqua-blue tint. I'm curious to see how it looks after 100 hours of burn in. I've raised the reflector about 4 inches higher, and have cut the photo period down from 8 hours to 3 hours per day. I'm really hoping I don't fry the corals.
After running for 3 hours, my tank's temp rose from 79.8F to 80.3F. With my 175W, my tank temp would normally rise to 80.8F after 8 hours, so it appears that I should not have any heat issues with the new fans installed in conjunction with the new bulb. I keep my house at 79F in the day, and 77 at night. I keep my heater set at around 79.5F. I'm pretty happy knowing I can run a 400W MH without a chiller.
I know I talk a lot about efficiency, but depending upon the tank's dimensions, it appears that T5s still don't really compete with MH. I ran an 8x54 TEK light fixture on my previous 150G tank, and it was nowhere near as bright as this. It also drew 532 watts as rated on my kill-a-watt meter. I haven't measured this HQI ballast yet, but Sanjay was recording 479 watts in his test.
This T5 vs MH thread shows how a single 175 Iwasaki was kicking the crap out of a 6x54 T5 combo. I'm not trying to bash T5s because I've seen that they can create beautiful results. I'm just saying that they don't quite deserve all the efficiency hoopla they've been getting. They also cost quite a bit more to replace each year than a single MH lamp.
I will post some pics in a couple of weeks of the new lighting and its effects on my corals.
After running for 3 hours, my tank's temp rose from 79.8F to 80.3F. With my 175W, my tank temp would normally rise to 80.8F after 8 hours, so it appears that I should not have any heat issues with the new fans installed in conjunction with the new bulb. I keep my house at 79F in the day, and 77 at night. I keep my heater set at around 79.5F. I'm pretty happy knowing I can run a 400W MH without a chiller.
I know I talk a lot about efficiency, but depending upon the tank's dimensions, it appears that T5s still don't really compete with MH. I ran an 8x54 TEK light fixture on my previous 150G tank, and it was nowhere near as bright as this. It also drew 532 watts as rated on my kill-a-watt meter. I haven't measured this HQI ballast yet, but Sanjay was recording 479 watts in his test.
This T5 vs MH thread shows how a single 175 Iwasaki was kicking the crap out of a 6x54 T5 combo. I'm not trying to bash T5s because I've seen that they can create beautiful results. I'm just saying that they don't quite deserve all the efficiency hoopla they've been getting. They also cost quite a bit more to replace each year than a single MH lamp.
I will post some pics in a couple of weeks of the new lighting and its effects on my corals.