Have ICH looky here!!!!!

Thanks guys! I hope the fish can make it to this weekend when I have a chance to do this.

On a related note, is it OK to use different salt for the QT? For example, right now I use reef crystals in my main tank. For the QT setup I would be transfering over tank water to fill it up, and refilling my main tank with instant ocean. Then I'd be doing the water changes on the QT with IO salt (to save money). I think IO and RC are pretty similar, so I hope this will not be a big shock to the main tank or the fish in the QT...
 
Thank you WK.

I am still curious on why Cu treatment is the gold standard, when hyposalination is easier and cheaper. In the first post it says all three methods are "proven," yet Cu still seems to be far more popular. I am assured to rid my fish and tank of the ich by following the hypo procedure precisely, right? It would be a pain to go through all that work to have one organism survive and repopulate the tank with ich!
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15080768#post15080768 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by becact
Thank you WK.

I am still curious on why Cu treatment is the gold standard, when hyposalination is easier and cheaper. In the first post it says all three methods are "proven," yet Cu still seems to be far more popular. I am assured to rid my fish and tank of the ich by following the hypo procedure precisely, right? It would be a pain to go through all that work to have one organism survive and repopulate the tank with ich!

there are actually three preferred methods that Water keeper has outlined earlier in this thread and I have also done on my blog:
http://www.reefcentral.com/wp/?p=286

There are alot of possible reasons but only speculation
it is a faster treatment for those in a rush

somepeople might not want to bring the salinity down to 1.009 as they feel it is very close to the limit for fish and or it stresses them out more

you really need to buy a refractometer to measure the salinity for hyposalinating---some can't see the worth in that.

just a few that come to my mind

;)
 
Do you think hypo is more stressful that copper? Can the fish "feel" the copper? (I realize no one knows for sure). Personally I don't see how Cu is faster, since you still have to wait for the ich in the tank to die off, right? So either way the fish are going to have to be in QT for at least 4 weeks...

luckily I already have a refractometer. Would calibrating with RO/DI be best since it is closer to 1.009 than than a standard saline solution?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15081183#post15081183 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by becact
Do you think hypo is more stressful that copper? Can the fish "feel" the copper? (I realize no one knows for sure). Personally I don't see how Cu is faster, since you still have to wait for the ich in the tank to die off, right? So either way the fish are going to have to be in QT for at least 4 weeks...

luckily I already have a refractometer. Would calibrating with RO/DI be best since it is closer to 1.009 than than a standard saline solution?

no buy the pinpoint calibrating solution which calibrates to 35ppt which is sea water

http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2006-12/rhf/index.php#20
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15081183#post15081183 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by becact
Do you think hypo is more stressful that copper? Can the fish "feel" the copper? (I realize no one knows for sure). Personally I don't see how Cu is faster, since you still have to wait for the ich in the tank to die off, right? So either way the fish are going to have to be in QT for at least 4 weeks...

very true--lets change faster to less invovled;)

I don't know if hypo is more stressful then copper but some reefers have reported that some tangs don't do well with copper medications but hypo doesn't seem to bother them.
 
Cool, well it's hypo for me then. I asked about the RO/DI for a calibration because calibrating to 0 salinity is closer to the 1.009 mark than the 35ppt mark. Ideally would would have a 1.009 calibration fluid to calibrate before each measurement, but using RO/DI is closer to the mark than a 35ppt solution.

I understand a 35ppt solution should be used for calibrating the tool before tank water measurements.
 
copper ich medication and a copper test kit ....can you please just tell me the name of a good copper med. I look and see so many I get nervous. I am going to put all my fish in a ten gal hospital tank, bare bottem, pvc pipes, hob filter and heater. The coral beauty and three small marroon clowns, lawn mower and scooter blenny, and a green spotted puffer. The shrimps will be ok in the DT with the anemonea, right? Can i run this small of a tank for the durration of the meds? Maybe with alot of pvc....
 
Effectively treat marine ich in aquariums housing corals and anemones. NO-ICH Marine is a copper and Malachite Green free water treatment that biodegrades in 4 to 5 days. See this is just one of many, i really don't know what to get....i just want to get rid of the ick
 
You basically have two forms of copper treatment. The first is plain inorganic copper usually copper sulfate. It is fast and effective but dosage control is crucial as it can be overdosed and too little does not control ich.

The other type is chelated copper an organically bound copper; Cupramine is an example. It is not as quick as the inorganic form but gives more slack in the precise dosage needed for the inorganic. It tends to do less harm than the inorganic if overdosed and is more persistent so slight under dosing still can control the parasite. The LFS probably carries both types.

NEVER use copper in the display or on invertabrates.

Your plan for the QT tank is fine.
 
thank-you so much...our LFS has nothing. and niether does walmart. i have to go about an hour away or order online. The latter will stop the impulse buying...

I assume a fresh water dip before return to the display to get all the copper off?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15081183#post15081183 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by becact
Would calibrating with RO/DI be best since it is closer to 1.009 than than a standard saline solution?
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15081446#post15081446 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by capn_hylinur
no buy the pinpoint calibrating solution which calibrates to 35ppt which is sea water
You have a very good point, becact, and the capn is right with one important addition.

IF your refractometer has a slope error, then calibrating only with 35ppt solution would either make hypo treatment ineffective (too high, above 1.009sg) or potentially harmful (too low, below 1.009sg), with a greater margin of error as you moved away from the 35ppt mark.

To compensate for this you should calibrate with 35ppt solution and then TEST your refractometer using RO water.
If the RO measures 0ppt then you can rest assured that you do not have a slope error, and your refractometer is accurate at all points between 0ppt to 35ppt.

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15089964#post15089964 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by bobbyjeb
I assume a fresh water dip before return to the display to get all the copper off?
While a FW dip is a good treatment for other kinds of health problems/parasites, it's not necessary to "rinse" your fish before returning to the DT.
When your copper treatment is done, water changes and/or active carbon will remove the remaining copper from your QT long before your fallow period is over.

Besides, there is probably a greater amount of copper already contained in your reef salt mix then there will be in either your fish's bladder or on it's body even during treatment.
 
Last edited:
Nope,

Left it open as I knew there would be questions and people have even had me add to the original post with updates.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15046143#post15046143 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by capn_hylinur
Formalin is not an effective way of treating for ich--so those 14 days don't count.

why do you say this when it is listed on the first page as one of the 3 proven methods?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15162476#post15162476 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by uhuru
why do you say this when it is listed on the first page as one of the 3 proven methods?

not a good post for me definetly---I'm suprised someone didn't see it sooner.:eek:

What was meant by me was that since formalin had not been effective for the poster then they can't count that as 14 days in quarantine.

Thanks for catching that uhuru:thumbsup:
 
well the funny thing is, greenbean also says it here:

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1649045&perpage=25&pagenumber=2

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15161659#post15161659 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by greenbean36191
Why try to reinvent the wheel? Ich is a very commercially important parasite and as a result there has been a lot of research on treatments. Currently, hyposalinity, copper, and tank transfer are it. There's really no sense in trying to use treatments that have already been shown to be of little or no use in controlling the parasite. It's still commercially important because there still aren't any simple treatments.

Things that have been tried unsuccessfully (not an exhaustive list):
cleaner fish and shrimp
formalin
fresh water baths (up to 18 hours)
UV sterilizers
malachite green
methylene blue
various quinine derivatives
various imidazoles (including metronidazole)
penicillin
acriflavin
pyrimethamine
potassium permanganate
sodium chlorite
nitrofurazone
para-rosaniline
aminoacridine

Things that have never been tested:
garlic derivatives
pepper derivatives

While garlic has never been directly tested for use against ich there are considerable reasons to doubt it functions as hobbyists hypothesize.

"Reef-safe" treatments that do not seem to be reef safe (definitely not exhaustive):
Rally
Stop Parasites

Some important quotes about the effectiveness of various treatment approaches (from Colorni and Burgess, 1997)-
"Chemotherapeutants added to the water are rarely absorbed through the skin of the fish in a quantity sufficient to affect the trophonts (Herwig, 1978, 1979). As tomonts, the cyst wall of C. irritans is similarly impervious to medication (the prolonged period of tomont development in C. irritans makes this parasite more difficult to eradicate than I. multifiliis). Consequently, chemotherapeutics that destroy C. irritans during its parasitic or encysted phase would probably also kill the fish (Herwig, 1978)." In other words, when the little white dots disappear from your fish, it's because of the natural lifecycle of the parasite, not the medication.

"hyposalinity does not upset the osmotic balance of the trophonts, which are not adversely affected when a prolonged (18 h) freshwater treatment is administered to the host (Colorni, 1992)."
 
Back
Top