bif24701
New member
I did until I nuked the tank with my alk spike, in late October I think. Then, I removed the mh and led for 4 tubes of t5. But I've en been recently hearing whispers in my head that my old lighting was doing a better job. The whispers are becoming shouts...
So, rather than go to the trouble of rewriting my signature, I think I'll just go and change my lighting back...
I miss the MH shimmer and the supplemental, programmable led.
I just can't the mh out of my mind.. they are like sugar, once you've had some, you can't stop wanting it!
I can understand that, MH is sweet. That is why I went with Kessil AP700s,and now that I have started to add T5s ATI Blue+ its a system that I think is hard to beat for both power and aesthetics. I plan to add another Hamilton Aruba Sun for a total of 4 60" T5s. I think I have finally found the sweet spot with my system as far as NO3/lighting intensity goes. I will be following along with you with interest in the relationship of NO3/intensity. Seems to me that my system and (with information from an article by Mike Palletta) those of the "masters" there is a common theme there; Lots of food (NO3), lots of light (intensity/duration). Sanjay's photo period includes a 9 hour peak @100%, and if you know his tank he has more Radions over it than whats really suggested for SPS. Just some of my thought typed out here, sorry.
what are your thoughts on that?