aoc230
Aoc230
i would do it like this? i don't see a point in running clean water to the sump, maybe i just haven't had enough convincing? sorry don't run with the sheep unfortunately i need reasons on why things are done(rebel lol). if you wanted a secondary filtration put reactors in the return area.. i would run it at only 20-25% flow going thru the refugium section, eventually after the waters run thru the system a couple of dozen times its all the same??? i see it as all the same except your original way is being fed by gravity, no power loss, im huge on that.
so im in the process of redesigning my sump/refugium as i read that it is better to have slow flow through refugiums.
my new plans for my sump/refugium will have two seperate drain pipes. one going to a skimmer section on one side and another drain pipe going to a refugium on the other side. the return pump will be in the center chamber and flow to the refugium will be controlled by a ball valve.
but if slow flow is not required for a refugium it would be much easier to just have my sump set up as skimmer/refugium/return since the drain pipes would just have to be routed to one side.
so im just looking to see the pro's and con's of slow/fast flow through a refugium.
here is a paint diagram of my sump/refugium. its not to scale
![]()