MH vs LED POWER CONSUMPTION

Last edited:
Btw my 2 175 halides add no heat to the water

They have to be adding heat to the water, just not enough to raise the temp of the tank. Im sue the heater is on less when the halides are on.

When I was running 2x250 up until a couple weeks ago, the tank temp would raise from 78.5- 80.5 by the end of the photoperiod.

Running the 2x175s now, the tank temp does not raise at all. However, looking at my Apex, the heater is on much less when those halides are on.
 
I dont have a masters but i do have an associates degree in Eletronics. Very well put. Alot of people are going by the output of the driver which as you state its power drawn from the input. Thanks for posting it so clearly.

What leds are you running? cree XPGs have a max forward voltage of 3.3. Your at 39.6v if that is what you are running. That driver is stated at 1.1a at 48v.. You shouldn't be pulling 1.4a.

I have 5 meanwell 700s, and 4 48Ds. My 48Ds pulls 60 watts with 12 cree XPGs at 900ma. I havn't checked the 700s.
 
Amps-1.4 volts-110
110 voltsx1.4 amps =154 watts as stated

But the output of the driver is 48vand it is 700ma, or .7

Id be curious as to what his killa watt says in watts, because we are charged by kilowatt hours. Im sorry, but people would not be realizing almost any power savings if 12 3-watt LEDs were pulling 154 watts from the wall.
 
Agree with you 100%. I got my bulbs from 1000bulbs.com. $11 each. This is the happiest ive been with bulbs since ive been reefing. I just took out ushios when i changed bulbs and wont be going back. I plan on buying a bunch at this price som im good for years.

what kind of garbage mh bulbs are you buying for $2x a piece?

Harsh words coming form someone who probably buys $90 bulbs. Being as I have done my research, maybe you should also, and you would not have to spend so much on yours.
http://stores.ebay.com/Trust-Deals-...id=60008317&_trksid=p4634.c0.m14.l1581&_pgn=1
Never the less, he you go. I run these lights, I have run your $$ lights, you might try them first before you say anything.
 
Basic electrical knowledge: watts = amps x volts...now use that calculator I suggested!!!

Oh dude you are not only ignorant in Engineering, but common sense as well as reading ability. Kindly please read my post completely, work with your smart calculator & then work on criticizing. Seriously now, you seem like a teen who knows everything.
1.4 Amps * 110 Volts = 154 Watts. This is the power drawn by the driver to step down & regulate 48 V DC @ 750mA to operate 12 LED's.

I do understand you can get an efficient driver, but the reality of LED practically is as stated above.

Seriously now, you have over 1400 posts, don't spoil your reputation with ignorant comments.
 
True but the entire circuit is pulling 1.4 amps at 110 volts. You have to go by what is being pulled from the wall. Thats what the electric company cares about.

But the output of the driver is 48vand it is 700ma, or .7

Id be curious as to what his killa watt says in watts, because we are charged by kilowatt hours. Im sorry, but people would not be realizing almost any power savings if 12 3-watt LEDs were pulling 154 watts from the wall.
 
The heat is blown out the side of the fixture. I can put my hand directly under the bulb, outside of the fixture, and it's just slightly warm

They have to be adding heat to the water, just not enough to raise the temp of the tank. Im sue the heater is on less when the halides are on.

When I was running 2x250 up until a couple weeks ago, the tank temp would raise from 78.5- 80.5 by the end of the photoperiod.

Running the 2x175s now, the tank temp does not raise at all. However, looking at my Apex, the heater is on much less when those halides are on.
 
But the output of the driver is 48vand it is 700ma, or .7

Id be curious as to what his killa watt says in watts, because we are charged by kilowatt hours. Im sorry, but people would not be realizing almost any power savings if 12 3-watt LEDs were pulling 154 watts from the wall.


The driver adjusts the voltage to keep the current at 700ma. It will only output what the leds need to "break open".
 
Basic electrical knowledge: watts = amps x volts...now use that calculator I suggested!!!

But the output of the driver is 48vand it is 700ma, or .7

Id be curious as to what his killa watt says in watts, because we are charged by kilowatt hours. Im sorry, but people would not be realizing almost any power savings if 12 3-watt LEDs were pulling 154 watts from the wall.

I will get some pics of my Kill-o-watt reading, but never the less why is it so hard to comprehend
48V DC * 0.75 Amps = 36 Watts = 12 X 3 Watt LED's.

For the Driver to step down 110V AC to 48 V DC, the transformer & regulator used in most LED kits today consume 110V AC * 1.1 Amps (as stated) = 121 Watts.
According to my reading using Amp meter it read 1.4 Amps => 154 Watts.
 
Doesn't always work like that with electronics. You would have to know the PF.
Since we have a transformer & regulator, the PF is slightly less then 1. This will still not change the power drawn by the driver at any given point of time. If you want to get into PF discussion I feel it is irrelevant, but if you feel other wise we can take it offline via PM's or a different thread since it involves quite a bit of calculations.
I'm just trying real hard to explain Ohm's law here.
 
Then why is the person with the following tests showing 186 watts? According to what you say, with his multiple drivers, he should be seeing many more watts on the killawatt, right?

The Heatsink is a 24” x 8.46” from HeatsinkUSA. The LED strips are 6 XR-E Royal Blue/White and 4 XRE Royal Blue. The drivers are MeanWell 60-48D. The four Royal Blue strips are driven at full power (at 9 volts appx 580mA) in 2 parallel series of 12 LEDs. The other Royal Blue/White Strips are driven by a single MeanWell 60-48D adjusted to 750mA at 9Vdc

OpticsBareOFF.jpg


The drivers were adjusted and the input voltage was provided by a Radio Shack Enercell. Par was measured 24” above the fixture center mass and 24” centered but 12 “ to the side. The meter was an Quantum Flux Apogee meter MQ-200. Watts were measured with the common KillaWatt meter.

OpticsON.jpg


No Optics

Driver Input........PAR@24”..........PAR@24”..........Watts
Volts DC.........Center Mass........Center + 12”

9......................214....................142.................186
7.5....................180...................128..................162
6.......................152...................100.................124
4.5....................104....................82....................84
3.......................78.....................58....................49
1.5.....................32.....................22...................21

Bill
 
True but the entire circuit is pulling 1.4 amps at 110 volts. You have to go by what is being pulled from the wall. Thats what the electric company cares about.

Bingo! Good luck explaining this further. But thanks for making my point simple.
 
Jim, Jim, Jim, I know Bill very well. He lives by my place, I will talk to him as well tomorrow. In the mean time I will get the picture of my Kill-o-Watt & show you the power drawn by driver for 12 LED's.
Either case please understand AC input to the driver to DC output to drive the LED's.
 
For the Driver to step down 110V AC to 48 V DC, the transformer & regulator used in most LED kits today consume 110V AC * 1.1 Amps (as stated) = 121 Watts.
According to my reading using Amp meter it read 1.4 Amps => 154 Watts.


This is where my problem/confusion lies. That it consumes that much power doing the stepping down. That driver must be hot as anything, right?
 
What are you paying for an electric rate and are you in a hot area?

For comparison, my halides and led actinics cost less than $12/month to run and my skimmer costs less than$2 a month. An AI fixture would save me $60 a year in electric and $120 in bulbs, for a total of $1260 over 7 years. Even buying all my equipment new at $800, an AquaIlluminations setup still comes in more expensive at at least $2100.

LEDs can save a good amount of people alot of money, but blanket statements that they will save everyone money and pay for themselves in a few years cannot be made. In a few years, when that AI comes down by half? Then it will apply to alot more people.
My power cost 0.2264 $/kw
i was wrong in my original statement i forgot to change value of hours in excell spread sheet. so is closer to $100 per month for power add to this 350 a year for new arcadia globes MH only
$200 for arcadia T5 80watt very hard to get in australia for some unknown reason)
so savings of $550 globes provide i dont blow any mh globes prematurity (happend twice last year)
$50 per month on power (generous estimation)
is saving me 1150 a year just on globes and lighting power,
add chiller savings, plus aircon.
there is also the aesthetic reasons i now have the sun rising in the west and setting in the east with moonlight chasing the sun, i can match the weather to that outside eg cloudy, stormy etc
although i am sure it is all not savings as i am aware in winter my haildes did do there part in keeping the tank warm so i guess in stead of using a chiller making a hot room hotter i will be using a heater to make a cold tank warmer, personal comfort i would rather cooler surrounds for both my fish and myself.
yes my vertex is 400 watt but at no time is it ever pulling that, even in the middle of the peak usage it is only ramped up to 80% power and thats only 1 of the 3 colors
 
Back
Top