Anemonebuff
New member
This posted was started with a actual observation.
12 LED's 1 Driver consumes 1.5 Amps = 154 Watts
1 MH 250 Watt consumes 2.4 Amps = 264 Watts
I was told by major suppliers here that I will need at least 2 X 12 LED set to match a 250W MH.
This being said, the power consumption of LED is more than MH lighting.
Bulb replacement logic is meaning less, Solaris company also said LED bulbs last 10,000 Hours, how many have actually tested this? I'm not denying this, but I'm not buying this number straight off either. I don't believe LED's are maintenance free.
Have you ever touch a LED? see how hot it gets? Heat = energy wasted, if LED's are so very efficient why do you have to use heat sinks?
For a larger system, it costs more to run LED set up than MH in respect to power utilization. If you have 1, plug in your Kill-o-Watt & test this out. Support your numbers with some base.
By the way, the OP is my buddy who helped me set up LED Actinic suppliment lighting for my MH & I Love it. It is just not a cost effective reason to go LED's.
1st, 12 LEDs(assuming 3 watt LEDs) run at max power along with the driver would use about 40 watts. However, most under drive the LEDs at 2-2.4 watts each. So let's say that the LEDs are using 36 watts per 12 LED panel. Two of those would be 72 watts(like one AI module does). The AI's give PAR closer to a 400 watt bulb and use only 72 watt.
2nd., LEDs get hot, but nowhere near as hot as MHs. Touching a 175 watt MH bulb will give you at minimum 2nd degree burns. I can hold my hands on my PAR38s for a long time and it is just warm to the touch. We only use heatsinks to wisk away the heat from the diodes because they are heat sensitive and heat reduces the diode life.
Last edited: