Lassef
Member
Respectfully, your calculations simply do not account for several realities and the fact that the rest of us don't get better PAR in water than in air....
As stated, if we take into account the refractive index of seawater and air (not a seawater and a vacuum), couple that with the losses incured by the density and clarity of the water and the fact that a partially collimated light source is already present (a focused beam) then account for the small diameter of the sensor reading the PAR it is hard to fathom a gain.
Look at it this way:
A large portion of this thread has been spent talking about the color of light that reaches the coral and what is absent, but presnt in the sunshine that strikes the water. That light travels 83 million miles from the sun (subject to the Law of Inverse Squares) and then passes through about 600 miles of "air" with most of its wavelengths still intact when it strikes the water surface (even on a cloudy day), only to have MOST of those wavelengths stripped away in the first few feet of water.
This is not something your spreadsheet calculations are going to model very well
If you are seeing an increase in PAR in some areas during in water measurments (as compared to the in air measurements) they are likely due to the reflectance of the glass, and to that end the more focused the initial beam, the less collimating effect you from the water and/or reflectance from the glass. Hope that makes sense![]()
I have done a lot of tests i different areas in my aquarium with one glass window (120*65*60 cm). The same results everywhere. We are talking about a distance of 60 cm in water and a concentration of the lighting area with around 40 % through the differences of the refractive index between air and water. I do not think you loss 40 % of the intensity in 60 cm of water. There is other people I know that have the same experiences when working with lenses and water depths around 60 cm. And I´m using lenses - not reflectors. For reflectors - I do not know the result - I have not test. I was myself surprised over the result with my calculations of difference of the beam area in water vs air, so if you find any major mistake in my calculations you are welcome to correct me.
I found 44 % lesser area - it means for me somewhere between 30 - 45 % in reality because my formulas is based on a average of the refractive index and a calm surface. It is also important to stress that I use ozone in this aquarium so I do not have the normal amount of yellow humus in my water. My water is very clear, some particle but not colored water
I know that reflection can have a huge importance on PAR readings, I have seen examples with bare glass aquariums how you can changes the PAR readings just through not paint your backside of the aquarium or to chose a colored film as a background. This is not the case with my aquarium. The whole backside is covered by artificial rocks
However - I´ll do some experience later on when my Dream Chips are up and running - and I´ll try to find a way to do the measurements without any chance of reflection.
Sincerely Lasse