<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9073466#post9073466 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by northbay-reefer
Oh without a doubt, and I hope hydor will do well because this is good for this hobby
I agree with you that they could probably make it slightly smaller, but the Tunzes will hold the medal for compactness just because Hydor's mechanism for ensuring the prop spins in the right direction depends on an inch of sliding space for the prop/impeller. Also, the mounting mechanism is slightly less compact than the Tunze nanos.
Overall, this is a very great time for reefkeepers in general and the Hydors are an awesome addition to those wanting an affordable and safe way of entering the high flow, low velocity reefkeeping era that is a little bit more aesthetically pleasing than Seios.

Also, I'm not comparing these to DIY projects such as maximods and you can't mention the oceanflo mods because they are no longer in business.
I mean, it's hard to think of a cheaper way of adding quality flow to a small tank. Also, if you were going add flow to a 300 gallon tank and wanted about 30X turnover. It'd be hard to beat the Hydor 4's. For roughly 400 bucks and some change, you can get 9600 gph of flow, that's probably the cheapest way of getting that much flow in a powerhead that is easily mountable and secure that is reliable (I hope...

).
Of course if I had a 300 gallon tank, I might use much more expensive ways of producing flow (Tunze streams, Vortechs, Wavebox, Surge boxes with motorized ball valves, etc.), but I would still consider using the Hydors for trouble areas where I felt there were dead spots.
Cheers,
John