I asked Aquarium Plants the question and this is the response:
Single: there is no need for a dual stage with this design. The fact that is NOT have a needle valve eliminates the potential for "œdumping""¦
Company that sells the unit says a better regulator is not needed, shocking. A needle valve has absolutely nothing to do with an end of tank dump. End of tank dump happens when the co2 tank pressure drops to a certain point that the regulator can no longer control it so the remaining co2 in the tank is released by the regulator. A dual stage regulator does not allow this to happen.
My co2 background comes from the planted tank world and you will have a really hard time finding someone in the planted tank world with the aquarium plants regulator. Considerably better units are available for cheaper if you look through ebay. I have 3 regulators. A victor vts-253b on my reef tank, an airgas y12d on a planted tank and a matheson 3102C as a backup. I paid less than $50 each for the airgas and matheson.
If you added the carbondoser box to a dual stage regulator could you still adjust the bubble size? Long way from understanding regulators. lol
Not if your bubble size and rate is already set by the needle valve. It may speed up some with the possible increase of pressure but I've never had mine dump so quickly that there was a large drop in pH at the end of a tank. In fact the only way I know my tank is empty is the slow gradual increase of pH once it's out of gas (and yes it always happens when it's a few hours before I can get there to swap it out lol)
Are you talking about a blip in my attached picture? I've never seen a setup at 1bps but I still don't see how it would matter if the needle valve is restricting the bubble count already. When the pressure increases due to the lack of regulation the bubble size would get larger and maybe slightly faster but it's still restricted by the needle valve.
Are you saying that at 5+bps your needle valve is all the way open and so you just get a big burp into your reactor? I'm just asking because I don't see this problem and I think there is more to it than just a single stage regulator.
An eotd is not guaranteed to happen every time the tank gets low. I ran a single stage regulator for a year on a planted tank without an eotd. All it took was one time to gas and wipe out all my fish. Never gain after that. If someone runs their pH at 6.6 a single eotd is enough to make the pH go so low that is turns the stuff to mush and one dumps super sky high alk in the tank.And I agree with much of what you said. However, referring back to my graph that I posted. Even if the probe couldn't detect the eotd fast enough to react as you state, it would still pickup the pH drop in the reactor after that and before the rise in pH occurs. That however is not what I see so what makes my Milwaukee single stage not show this behavior?
I've heard the stories and seen the pictures people posted. However if my CA reactor drops .5 below my low set point then the Masterflex gets turned off to prevent dumping sky high alk into my tank.
So even if I can't prevent the eotd from happening, or even detect it quick enough to shut off the solenoid to prevent the reactor pH from dropping too far, I can turn off the the effluent going into my tank and save the entire system.
Though now instead of one piece of equipment working to account for an instance you are reling on your probe to work, the controller to pick that up and properly hit the electrical, the solenoid to not jam, and the masterflex to kill power.
You have it covered in case it happens sure but you have added a ton of moving pieces to ensure no disaster whereas a dual stage would handle that by itself.