People eaters = Zoanthus gigantus

Fcwham

New member
A new paper came out this month in Zoological Science which revised the taxonomy of Zoanthus Species.

Many have been saying that people eaters are protopalythoa I have said they are Zoanthus for years but now finaly there is genetic data that places them in the genus Zoanthus.

if anyone is interested I can give more info, I know this has been a hot topic in the past on this forum
 
I'd be interested in seeing it. Every article I've seen has all large polyped species (once listed as palythoa) listed as protopalythoa. Does that mean that there is no such thing as protopalythoa, then?
 
i beleive i saw something about the renaming of the zoanthid taxonomy in the reefkeeping magazine, or advanced aquariust magazine.

i know they said the system was long over due for an overhaul.

please post the link, or the text to the actual research publication :)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7158982#post7158982 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Reef Junkie
Great article!:D

I wonder what kind of implications this has for us hobbyists?

the price of a protopaly will go down, b/c they are of the same species and not so "rare" after all!!! :lol: :lol: :eek2:
 
lol surf :lol:

I doubt the prices will change, but I am happy that the Palythoa/protopalythoa nazi's have been dealt a fatal blow! :lmao:
 
I can not send a link to the publication which I posted about you all would just get a screen asking you to buy the articul because you are not subscribed to the research journal, for those of you in college your school is likely to be subscribed so here is the info to look it up:

Zoological Science 23: 261-275 (2006)

Morphological and molecular revision of zoanthus from southwestn japan, with descriptions of two new species

by: James Davis Reimer

that other artical was also interesting but this one aplys directly to People eaters and formaly names them Z. gigantus
 
I will email James Reimer tonight and see if I can post some of his pics and what not.
He also made a "key to species" this is the shortend version of the identification of Z. gigantus:
"White vertical stripes on serface of closed polyp; polyp diameter towards oral disk usually over twice as wide as polyp diameter at base." (Reimer 2006)

there are pics as well one looks like the RPE and one like the GPE

this work was done with zoas from around southwest Japan so he didn't necessarily use PPE and he was collecting from the wild so it is posable that the group we as hobbiest call PE are of a broader range and are of more than one species however by placing these ones from Japan in the Genus Zoanthus it means that all PE are Zoanthus and are likely gigantus but not necessarily
 
Could someone post a pic of PPE with there polyps closed? that way everyone who doesn't have them can see the Identifying white bands? also If you have other PE post them with polyp closed lets see if they all have white bands.
 
yes, i know what you are talking about with the white bands, i'll see if i can round up some pics of other PE types

i thought this characteristic was already something that was established for protopalys? i know thats what i've looked for as a good characteristic for the past year. b/c in my LFS the lights are terrible on the frag tank, and the polyps are usually closed anyways b/c the polyps are stressed out.
 
So, the theory is that PPE type protopalythoas are really a large type of zoanthus? Now that is interesting. Especially when it comes to this whole zoa pox problem people have been having. It only seems to effect zoanthids, but not protopalythoa (PPE's)

Here is a pic with a PPE polyp closed, but I don't think it's a good example.
PPE.jpg
 
Here are some pics of the white bands.

Here we have some Red People Eaters.
RPE%20white%20bands.jpg


I dont know what these were called. But these are the ones that are purple, but with a pink/red skirt and green mouth.
PRPE%20white%20bands.jpg


those were the best pics of PE types with white bands I could get to turn out. I have a few others, but they are very small frags, which makes picture taking very challenging.

On a side note, while I had the camera out I thought I'd share what a true palythoa matt looks like just for S's and G's. They are pink, and had green centers for a while after I got them. But after I fragged them they must have been very stressed, and lost the green center. It doesn't help that I just added the new Iwasaki Aqua2 bulb to try out, so they still look kinda ticked off.
Open:
palythoa%20open.jpg

Closed:
palythoa%20closed.jpg


Hope this helps. :)
 
Nice!
Let those pinks settle in and keep an eye on your alk, they'll get their green mouth back.

Eh hem, not to brag too much, but look what I turned some of my pinks into with some TLC. :rolleyes:
LordofTheRings.jpg

Kindof need some LSD to look at them.:bum:
 
I think that the second one is also zoanthus, some zoanthus have a well developed coenenchyme and so you are not able to distingish between protopolythoa and zoanthus in this way. in other words just because they are connected in a solid mat does not mean they are palythoa (if you have the paper look at the picture on top of page 266 they compare the two newly named species. the one on the left has a solid well developed coenenchyme and it is in the genus Zoanthus

paythoa often incorporates sediment into its ectoderm and feels rough to the touch, it is also more actively carnivoruos and will feed on meaty foods ( not to say that zoanthus will not)
 
"an eye on your alk" Reefjunkie, what do you mean by that exactly? Just keeping it stable? or a high or low preference? i keep my dkH somewhat stable from 8-10 in a given week, i usually bump it back up to 10 every weekend.


Fcwham - right, i know solid continuous matts can be misleading. but i thought the defining characteristic of the palythoa, was the polyps are actually embeded in the matt/coenenchyme? as you can see, the pinks that i took pics of, do not have any stalk to speak, its not that they are small, they just dont exist.

correct me if i'm wrong on this, but with all zoanthids/protopalys, if you place them in light deficient area, they will extend their stalks longer, so the face of the polyp has a better chance of reaching the light? palythoa cannot do this b/c the polyps are actually embeded into the coenenchyme, correct?

i tried to blow on them harder, but they just werent cooperating. after the lights go out, the polyps completely disapear into the coenenchyme, you could run your finger over it and it would be a continuous flat surface (for the most part). not sure about the "roughness" though. I've tried to leave these guys alone after they lost their green centers :(
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7160460#post7160460 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by surfnvb7
"
i tried to blow on them harder, but they just werent cooperating.

You must be married...:lmao:

Sorry man, I couldn't resist.;)

Yep, your alk, keep it stable. 8-10, that's kosher.
Why do you spike it on the weekends? No time with work?
 
Back
Top