taxonomy
taxonomy
Monday morning - ugh!
In answer to your questions:
1. Does that mean that what was once classified as Protopalythoa grandis is now a Palythoa grandis or something along those lines? As I understand this, the genus Protopalythoa is bunk and void now, right?
Protopalythoa is not yet bunk and void. Even once a scientific paper is published, nomenclature changes (new species, combining species etc.) have to be formally adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. So as it is now Protopalythoa is a genus. BUT - from all the samples I have seen, and the paper we just put out, Protopalythoa and Palythoa are very closely related, and do not form seperate monophylies. In other words, if you made a family tree, Palythoa and Protopalythoa are not seperate branches but all jumbled together. There may be other Proto species out there that are different and form a seperate group - nothing is ever certain, but for now, as far I believe, Protopalythoa is "bunk and void".
2. How did you go about comparing the DNA? Just the whole restriction enzyme mapping and then running gels?
All the DNA methodology is in the paper - send me an email and I can send you the pdf if you want! Basically, PCR and direct sequencing was what we did, using universal and specific primers.
would love to see some pics of your "lab tanks"
I'll get on it when I can - but I assure you they aren't as beautiful as some of the pics I have seen on RC.
cheers,
James
taxonomy
Monday morning - ugh!
In answer to your questions:
1. Does that mean that what was once classified as Protopalythoa grandis is now a Palythoa grandis or something along those lines? As I understand this, the genus Protopalythoa is bunk and void now, right?
Protopalythoa is not yet bunk and void. Even once a scientific paper is published, nomenclature changes (new species, combining species etc.) have to be formally adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. So as it is now Protopalythoa is a genus. BUT - from all the samples I have seen, and the paper we just put out, Protopalythoa and Palythoa are very closely related, and do not form seperate monophylies. In other words, if you made a family tree, Palythoa and Protopalythoa are not seperate branches but all jumbled together. There may be other Proto species out there that are different and form a seperate group - nothing is ever certain, but for now, as far I believe, Protopalythoa is "bunk and void".
2. How did you go about comparing the DNA? Just the whole restriction enzyme mapping and then running gels?
All the DNA methodology is in the paper - send me an email and I can send you the pdf if you want! Basically, PCR and direct sequencing was what we did, using universal and specific primers.
would love to see some pics of your "lab tanks"
I'll get on it when I can - but I assure you they aren't as beautiful as some of the pics I have seen on RC.
cheers,
James