BreadmanMike
New member
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259320#post14259320 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by burton14e7
Reeflux + Lumenbright = glory
You have that right to a point. The LB's make an improvement for every bulb
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259320#post14259320 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by burton14e7
Reeflux + Lumenbright = glory
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259748#post14259748 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stanlalee
I tend to believe the reeflux 10k gets the job done and the 12k is a bit of a under achiever based on all data I'm aware of, not just objective numbers
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259515#post14259515 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by grigsy
lol, don't get all perturbed.
We were only going by OBJECTIVE numbers provided by Sanjay.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13946500#post13946500 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by JRaquatics
Here is my tanks progression within one year.
November 2007
![]()
December 2008
![]()
February 2008
![]()
March 2008
![]()
May 2008
![]()
September 2008
![]()
![]()
December 2008
![]()
![]()
What was your experience with Reeflux bulbs? Was there anything specific that you didn't like about the bulb besides low par?<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259938#post14259938 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by grigsy
You and me both. That is why I prefer most other bulbs to Reeflux.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14260216#post14260216 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by grigsy
Your tank looks nice.
But, the discussion wasn't "whether they work or not". He asked about Reeflux bulbs and I merely pointed out the PAR testing on those bulbs are very low. There are simply better choices available.
Some, including superddoc, may disagree with me.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14259802#post14259802 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by BreadmanMike
Look at the growth of Jeremy's tank with 250w 12k Reeflux. I'm not a fan of them as they look too white for me, but the results are pretty good on this tank.
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1313678
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=14261815#post14261815 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stony_corals
While it's important to understand what a bulb/ballast combo will give you in terms of PAR, it's leaves out a key variable in reef lighting: reflectors. Reflectors, IMHO, are the most important component in lighting. Many people have shown that the reeflux work well. Sanjay's readings are good in that they isolate how different bulbs burn on different ballasts and takes the reflector out of the equation. Given that a totm is getting 1200 PAR off LB, reeflux 12k, and cv 400w ballasts under the water, speaks to the merit of good reflectors and really illustrates that a PAR number doesn't mean much without a reading including a reflector.