raybyrne67
New member
A slotted spoon should work for taking out the large chunks. Maybe a small net.
Lots of 'half truths' in what you say, other than your final comment which is completely false. Indeed, I'd suggest that aesthetics are in fact the only reason to siphon clean a sandbed. Even a cursory consideration of the food chain would, I'd think, lead one to conclude that in the presence of an adequately diverse set of 'beneficial' organisms, the available nutrients would be largely consumed leaving 'poop' in the form of mineralized mulm. Siphoning the sandbed is the best way I can think of to ensure that this ecosystem of organisms never has the chance to get established.
I suppose we could debate whether, in our captive tanks, an adequately diverse set of organisms will become established. In depth treatments of deep sand beds, for example, suggest that the real issue is depletion of animal diversity in the sand. My own anecdotal observations over a long period of time has certainly led me to conclude that an un-siphoned sand bed is not a source of problematic nutrients; it's actually quite the opposite.
But, like I said, lots of threads here on RC on the topic, both pro and con, so no need to debate it further here I'd think.
if they are your must have organisms, then great. if you think that they are helping to keep things clean, then i would look more into how substrates work, and where all of the food is coming from that is supporting not only them, but the organisms that they feed on. all organic material contains P and N, whether that is poo, detritus, bacteria, or organisms themselves. an increase in all of this represents a total increase in N and P of the system. how is this a good thing? how can a system maintain its nutrient level, if there is obviously an increase in nutrients within a substrate shown by an increase in biomass? oh, wait, we have been told to not feed as much. lets starve the organisms we actually want to keep in order to control the biomass of the all of the support organisms, that are not really needed anyway. got to love reefer logic.
i am not saying that substrates are bad. they just do not behave in the way we have been told since the early 2000's. if you want one, great, whether that is for looks or for its eutrophic nutrient producing abilities, but its pros/cons need to be accounted for. it is going to fill up. it does in nature, and amazingly enough the same thing occurs in our systems.just take that into account when determining the trophic state desired for the system and the maintenance schedule wishing to be used.
G~
The OP ask a question, "The siphon method doesnt get this large matter, just the smaller stuff. Can I use something else to get it?". It appears the consensus answer is to simply scoop it out with a net, slotted spoon, fingers, or etc..
IMO, much of the discussion in this post really applies more to DSBs or maintaining diversity rather than the issues in OP's <2" deep sand bed. If the OP is receptive maybe the thread could discuss why the sand is clumping and ways to remedy the issue.
the sand itself creates its own detritus. flow over the top of a substrate is not going to stop the accumulation of detritus in a substrate. the same process that produces detritus from the LR is occurring in the substrate. bacterial activity produces detritus. rock and sand would not be live if it did not produce its own detritus.
G~
if the sand goes in empty fully rinsed of food (detritus) for the benthos, then how can a population of benthos get established if all of the detritus is migrated up and out of substrate? wouldn't this starve the benthos? if there is an ever increasing biomass of benthos from all of the detritus in the substrate, then how is this not increase in total P or N of a system? how does the N and P leave the substrate in a manner that is greater than what is going into the substrate? again, wouldn't this lead to a starving state for the benthos?
something is not making sense here, and i have a feeling it has to do with why every hobby/industry that deals with livestock want to get rid of the waste organic material as quickly as possible, but not the SW hobby industry.
G~