The great bare bottom debate

Mr. Brooks said:
Tiles have been in place since the tank was set up about a year ago. I never lift the tiles. There's no cavity underneath so I'm not worried about detritus buildup.

I took a new picture today:



My iPhone is picking up the purple in the LED's. It's much more natural looking in person with a mix of algae including purple coralline.
Click to expand...
Could be Tank Of the Month if it has sand....Just saying....XD

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 
CrayolaViolence said:
I think the uniqueness could make it tank of the month. Individuality and creativity in the hobby needs to be celebrated more ;)
Click to expand...

Thanks!

The image is picking up the tile shape, but in person its much less noticeable. Looks like a flat sheet of blue/white/purple.

Going barebottom allowed me to mount four MP40's on the bottom glass pointing up. They pull fish waste through the sides and up into the water column. The propellers chop it up into dust so it can float into the overflow and settle out in a settling tank or be skimmed out (if it gets past the setting tank). Keeps my tank super clean with almost zero effort. There is zero detritus to vacuum. I'm also able to blast the flow which will be nice when I start adding SPS frags.
 
Last edited:
While everything does look healthy in that tank above, I just don't understand why you would put tiles in the tank? All you've really done IMO is traded a pink bottom for a pink bottom with lines it. To each their own though.
 
Imo barebottom or sand should be decided purely on aesthetics considering neither is really that much work.


I have to say though I put starboard under my rocks in my tank which is a white panel for those that don't know and I did really like the look of a white bottomed tank, although i like my sand dwellers too much to sick with bare bottom.

Also I like the idea of the mp40s on the bottom, never seen that before
 
For the Eye.

For the Eye.

For the eye and personal preference sand is nice. I went through this when setting up my tank and decided to add a sand bed.

If I were to do it all over again I would NOT use sand. Too much food, debris, fish droppings get in the sand causing disease, rot etc. etc. etc.

A bare bottom tank is a personal eye appealing preference. A bare bottom tank is a clean tank. A bare bottom tank is extremely easy to clean with a simple net. When using a bare bottom tank you REALLY notice all the garbage that settles daily in the tank.

This is NOT opinion based but factual. After 40 years of different tank, sizes etc. etc. etc.
 
GOSKN5 said:
My issue with sand was keeping it as clean as I wanted... it always seemed to have some diatoms or cyano in spots..

I painted the bottom white on a couple tanks and haven't looked back... still not sand... but gives a decent look..

With the amount of stuff I suck out weekly I can't imagine going back to sand....

38a0c68278d068fc3354c8719071c0b3.jpg


527120ddb3bef49715a4e41b2218dc53.jpg


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...



I first thought it was a nice tank. But I been looking at the pictures again. There is no way this tank is a year old

I mean not one drop of coralline algae not even on the inside of the mp40. Not one drop on the bottom of the tank. No one is that good to get every last drop of coralline algae out of there tank




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
anthonys51 said:
I first thought it was a nice tank. But I been looking at the pictures again. There is no way this tank is a year old

I mean not one drop of coralline algae not even on the inside of the mp40. Not one drop on the bottom of the tank. No one is that good to get every last drop of coralline algae out of there tank




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Hahaha... you can't be serious??? Do I need to find pictures of TONS of tanks without coraline? Some which are many years old?

And since when does having coraline make a tank nice or not? Thanks for your input, which added nothing to the conversation whatsoever.

Scrape the glass often, clean the power heads in vinegar often... it works...

Also, in my current tank.. the 120 above.. there is absolutely coraline present.. but scraping the bottom and sides has kept it in check... the overflow shows coraline as do some of the rocks....

Still not sure what coraline has to do with the topic of this thread??

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
I think it's a fake picture. It has nothing to do with the bare bottom debate. But send me a picture of your tank. I will see some type of algae somewhere in the tank. Even those powerheads are spotless. Now you can believe if you want. But as for me and grandpa we don't believe :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Haha ok.. they are both certainly real... both my tanks at one time or another... I have tons of pictures of each coral, tank and fish.. several build threads on numerous forums locally and nationally for both tanks...

I also never said they were algae free.. I have some bubble algae I battle with as well as dusting on the glass and equipment.. and there is coraline present..

BUT.. I pride myself in putting in a lot of work to keep the glass clean and the tank as clean as possible..thus my reason for barebottom..

Weekly water changes, siphon out all detritus each week, scraping back and sides and bottom, filter sock, large skimmer, GFO, and other methods... it's all in what you put it in... but don't say they are fake pictures haha.... not even sure how I would fake it...

Yes the tanks are both fairly young.. the shallow was probably 18 months in and the 120 will be a year old in a week or so..

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
I will tell you that I have seen countless incredibly colorful photos of peoples tanks ... yet I have seen none so well colored in person. Hmmn! Not suggesting they are 'fake' necessarily, but many (most?) are not 'honest' representations. Also not suggesting they are all done intentionally, my own limited photographic skills (and tools) has made my tank pictures a challenge in terms of the photo accurately representing what I see with my own eyes. Caveat emptor!
 
I like bare bottom tanks. It allows me to run my flow high and syphon out detritus during water changes easily. They only look sterile for a few months. I would not put encrusting corals on the bottom. Removing them becomes a destructive process. Non-encrusting LPS corals are what I use. From a health of the tank angle, I really do not see one being better than the other, if properly maintained. If you do use sand just remember there is only so much you can actually clean in a grown in reef tank.

Here is my 7 month old BB tank.

IMG_1067-L.jpg
 
Last edited:
anthonys51 said:
I first thought it was a nice tank. But I been looking at the pictures again. There is no way this tank is a year old

I mean not one drop of coralline algae not even on the inside of the mp40. Not one drop on the bottom of the tank. No one is that good to get every last drop of coralline algae out of there tank




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...



First if all if you look closely you can see coralline here and there

Secondly why do you feel the need to derail this thread to start an argument?

Thirdly have you considered that before he goes to take pictures of his tank he gives it an extra scrub down so it looks better on camera?
 
I have sent the opposite... in most cases the tanks look a ton better in person than in photos... these tanks aren't easy to photograph...

These pics are all cell phone shots with adjusted white balance to remove the blue.. I really have nothing to hide haha... if I did I would enhance the bleached frogs pawn or the faded pocillipora...

I never said it was perfect or said it didn't have algae.. I was simply showing the white painted bottom for the barebottom debate haha... now my photos are fake

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
EdgeN said:
While everything does look healthy in that tank above, I just don't understand why you would put tiles in the tank? All you've really done IMO is traded a pink bottom for a pink bottom with lines it. To each their own though.
Click to expand...


Do you really need to understand? It's their vision, their expression, their creation. Tanks are quite often works of art, even when people don't mean for them to be.
Just enjoy the view.
 
I didn't start an argument just stating my opinion. In 30 years of keeping tanks and looking at them I never seen a tank that flawless of algae and frags perfectly placed unless it's a brand new tank. Now maybe I am wrong but why doesn't the person who has 2 spotless tanks simple take a video and prove me wrong. I am not always right. Been wrong a few times in my life but don't think I am on this one. But would loved to be proven wrong here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Q
Which mini snail for artemia tank?
Replies
2
Views
196
griss
griss
OrionN
Baby CB Regal Angel from Biota
Replies
8
Views
2K
OrionN
OrionN
Niven
I'm back....and ready to jump back in, feet first in the deep end, speedo, everything!
2
Replies
24
Views
782
griss
griss
R
Cyano and nutrients
2 3 4
Replies
77
Views
11K
Elmareefer
E
L
Should have known better.
Replies
2
Views
838
lb013
L
Back
Top